BOTZ vs ROBO: AI & Robotics ETFs — Different Bets on the Same Theme
BOTZ concentrates in fewer, larger robotics companies. ROBO equally weights 80+ global names. Both are expensive thematic ETFs for investors who want direct robotics exposure outside of broad tech funds.
BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF) and ROBO (ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF) are the two main pure-play robotics and AI ETFs. BOTZ holds roughly 40 companies with a modified market-cap tilt — Nvidia, Keyence, Fanuc, and Intuitive Surgical dominate. ROBO equally weights 80+ companies globally — giving industrial automation companies in Japan and Europe equal weight alongside US tech. BOTZ costs 0.68%; ROBO costs 0.95%. BOTZ's Nvidia overweight has been a significant performance driver in recent years. ROBO's broader diversification and equal weighting give more exposure to smaller industrial automation companies. Both are thematic ETFs with high fees — investors who believe in AI/robotics can access much of this theme through QQQ or broad tech ETFs at a fraction of the cost.
Whether the lower-cost fund suits your situation depends on your existing holdings, account type, tax situation, and how you use each fund. This is a cost comparison, not a personalized recommendation.
📋 BOTZ vs ROBO — Key Facts Side by Side
| Metric | BOTZ | ROBO |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Name | Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF | Robo Global Robotics and Automation Index ETF |
| Issuer | Global X | Exchange Traded Concepts |
| Tracks Index | Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence | ROBO Global Robotics and Automation Index |
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% ✓ | 0.95% |
| Cost per $10K/yr | $68.00 | $95.00 |
| AUM | $3.5B | $2.0B |
| Holdings | 42 | 83 |
| Inception | 2016 | 2013 |
| 1-Year Return | +14.34% | +37.81% |
| 3-Year Return | +9.42% | +13.51% |
| 5-Year Return | +1.30% | +5.01% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.47% | 0.34% |
| Holdings Overlap | See holdings overlap → | |
| Avg Bid-Ask Spread | 0.03% | 0.05% |
Expense ratio, AUM, and returns updated Jul 14, 2026 from ETF BFF database. Returns are annualised. Not investment advice.
📊 BOTZ vs ROBO — Annualised Returns
Annualised returns (trailing, price-based). Past performance does not guarantee future results.
🎯 Which Fund Fits Which Investor?
- want the lowest fees: saves ~$27/yr per $10K vs ROBO
- want geographic diversification beyond US stocks
- want broader diversification (83 holdings vs 42)
- want geographic diversification beyond US stocks
💰 What the Fee Difference Actually Costs
Adjust the numbers for your situation. This models each fund's expense ratio compounding against your balance over time.
Assumes a constant annual return reinvested, with each fund's expense ratio deducted yearly. Illustrative only; actual returns vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
⚙️ Want the Full Interactive Comparison?
Side-by-side holdings overlap, sector breakdown, and live performance tabs, all in one place.
Run Full BOTZ vs ROBO Comparison → Free · No signup · Instant resultsGlobal ETF investing made simple — one concept a week
Currency risk, hedged vs unhedged, emerging vs developed — demystified in plain English.
Free to learn forever · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime
❓ BOTZ vs ROBO — Frequently Asked Questions
New to ETF investing? See answers to the most common ETF questions →