MUB vs VTEB: Tax-Free Municipal Bond ETFs — VTEB Is Clearly Cheaper
MUB and VTEB both track the national investment-grade municipal bond market. VTEB charges 0.03%; MUB charges 0.07%. For buy-and-hold muni exposure, the fee difference matters.
MUB (iShares National Muni Bond ETF) and VTEB (Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) both provide exposure to the US investment-grade municipal bond market — state and local government bonds with federally tax-exempt interest. MUB tracks the ICE AMT-Free US National Municipal Index with ~3,500 bonds; VTEB tracks the Standard & Poor's National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index with ~6,500+ bonds. VTEB charges 0.03% vs MUB's 0.07% — more than double the fee for similar exposure. MUB has larger AUM ($28B vs $12B for VTEB) and a more developed options market. For long-term tax-exempt income investors, VTEB's lower cost is the clear winner. MUB only makes sense if you need options liquidity for tactical municipal bond positioning.
Whether the lower-cost fund suits your situation depends on your existing holdings, account type, tax situation, and how you use each fund. This is a cost comparison, not a personalized recommendation.
Both funds trade commission-free at every major brokerage. Where to buy them →
📋 MUB vs VTEB: Key Facts Side by Side
| Metric | MUB | VTEB |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Name | iShares National Muni Bond ETF | Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond Index Fund ETF Shares |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| Tracks Index | ICE AMT-Free US National Municipal | S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond |
| Expense Ratio | 0.07% | 0.03% ✓ |
| Cost per $10K/yr | $7.00 | $3.00 |
| AUM | $46.6B | $51.7B |
| Holdings | 3,500 | 6,500 |
| Inception | 2007 | 2015 |
| 1-Year Return | -5.55% | -5.90% |
| 3-Year Return | +2.71% | +2.79% |
| 5-Year Return | +0.04% | +0.00% |
| Dividend Yield | 3.40% | 3.60% |
| Holdings Overlap | See holdings overlap → | |
| Avg Bid-Ask Spread | 0.01% | 0.01% |
AUM and returns updated Oct 14, 2026 from ETF BFF database; expense ratios verified against issuer filings. Returns are annualised. Not investment advice.
Comparing two ETFs? Grab the free checklist.
The seven things that actually decide a comparison: the index, fee, overlap, tax, liquidity, concentration, and structure. One printable page.
No spam · Unsubscribe anytime · Your download opens instantly
Your download is ready above. We also emailed a confirmation link, click it to get The Expense Report, our weekly ETF newsletter.
📊 MUB vs VTEB: Annualised Returns
Annualised returns (trailing, price-based). Past performance does not guarantee future results.
🎯 Which Fund Fits Which Investor?
- want income and stability with lower portfolio volatility
- already use iShares and prefer staying within one fund family
- want the lowest fees: saves ~$4/yr per $10K vs MUB
- want broader diversification (6,500 holdings vs 3,500)
- want income and stability with lower portfolio volatility
💰 What the Fee Difference Actually Costs
Adjust the numbers for your situation. This models each fund's expense ratio compounding against your balance over time.
Assumes a constant annual return reinvested, with each fund's expense ratio deducted yearly. Illustrative only; actual returns vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
⚙️ Want the Full Interactive Comparison?
Side-by-side holdings overlap, sector breakdown, and live performance tabs, all in one place.
Run Full MUB vs VTEB Comparison → Free · No signup · Instant results❓ MUB vs VTEB: Frequently Asked Questions
New to ETF investing? See answers to the most common ETF questions →