MUB vs VTEB: Tax-Free Municipal Bond ETFs — VTEB Is Clearly Cheaper
MUB and VTEB both track the national investment-grade municipal bond market. VTEB charges 0.03%; MUB charges 0.07%. For buy-and-hold muni exposure, the fee difference matters.
MUB (iShares National Muni Bond ETF) and VTEB (Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) both provide exposure to the US investment-grade municipal bond market — state and local government bonds with federally tax-exempt interest. MUB tracks the ICE AMT-Free US National Municipal Index with ~3,500 bonds; VTEB tracks the Standard & Poor's National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index with ~6,500+ bonds. VTEB charges 0.03% vs MUB's 0.07% — more than double the fee for similar exposure. MUB has larger AUM ($28B vs $12B for VTEB) and a more developed options market. For long-term tax-exempt income investors, VTEB's lower cost is the clear winner. MUB only makes sense if you need options liquidity for tactical municipal bond positioning.
Whether the lower-cost fund suits your situation depends on your existing holdings, account type, tax situation, and how you use each fund. This is a cost comparison, not a personalized recommendation.
📋 MUB vs VTEB — Key Facts Side by Side
| Metric | MUB | VTEB |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Name | iShares National Muni Bond ETF | Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond Index Fund ETF Shares |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| Tracks Index | ICE AMT-Free US National Municipal | S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond |
| Expense Ratio | 0.07% | 0.03% ✓ |
| Cost per $10K/yr | $7.00 | $3.00 |
| AUM | $45.8B | $48.8B |
| Holdings | 3,500 | 6,500 |
| Inception | 2007 | 2015 |
| 1-Year Return | +3.06% | +3.16% |
| 3-Year Return | +3.40% | +3.55% |
| 5-Year Return | +0.78% | +0.84% |
| Dividend Yield | 3.16% | 3.34% |
| Holdings Overlap | See holdings overlap → | |
| Avg Bid-Ask Spread | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Expense ratio, AUM, and returns updated Jul 14, 2026 from ETF BFF database. Returns are annualised. Not investment advice.
📊 MUB vs VTEB — Annualised Returns
Annualised returns (trailing, price-based). Past performance does not guarantee future results.
🎯 Which Fund Fits Which Investor?
- want income and stability with lower portfolio volatility
- already use iShares and prefer staying within one fund family
- want the lowest fees: saves ~$4/yr per $10K vs MUB
- want broader diversification (6,500 holdings vs 3,500)
- want income and stability with lower portfolio volatility
💰 What the Fee Difference Actually Costs
Adjust the numbers for your situation. This models each fund's expense ratio compounding against your balance over time.
Assumes a constant annual return reinvested, with each fund's expense ratio deducted yearly. Illustrative only; actual returns vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
⚙️ Want the Full Interactive Comparison?
Side-by-side holdings overlap, sector breakdown, and live performance tabs, all in one place.
Run Full MUB vs VTEB Comparison → Free · No signup · Instant resultsBond ETFs without the fixed-income jargon
Duration, yield curves, credit risk — one clear concept per week, free forever.
Free to learn forever · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime
❓ MUB vs VTEB — Frequently Asked Questions
New to ETF investing? See answers to the most common ETF questions →