⚖️ QLD vs SSO Comparison · Free & No Signup

QLD vs SSO: 2x Leveraged Nasdaq vs 2x Leveraged S&P 500

QLD amplifies Nasdaq-100 daily moves 2x. SSO amplifies S&P 500 daily moves 2x. Both carry volatility decay risk, and QLD is more tech-concentrated and more volatile.

💰 SSO is cheaper 🔬 Compare top 10 holdings → 💡 Plain-English verdict

🤝 BFF Take

SSO Is More Diversified, QLD Is Higher-Octane for Tech Bulls

QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) and SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P 500) are 2x leveraged daily-reset ETFs. QLD tracks 2x the daily return of the Nasdaq-100, which holds 101 tech-heavy stocks. SSO tracks 2x the daily return of the S&P 500, which holds 503 stocks across all sectors. Both use swaps and derivatives to achieve daily leverage and reset each day, creating volatility decay over time. QLD is more volatile because the Nasdaq-100 is more volatile than the S&P 500, with bigger up days and bigger down days. SSO provides leveraged exposure with slightly more diversification. 2x leverage is more manageable than 3x (TQQQ/UPRO) but still carries meaningful decay risk in choppy markets.

📋 Quick Takeaways

📊QLD = 2x Nasdaq-100 (101 tech stocks); SSO = 2x S&P 500 (503 stocks), a broader underlying index

💸SSO costs 0.89% vs QLD's 0.95%, both expensive relative to unleveraged ETFs due to derivative costs

⚠️Both decay over time in volatile markets. 2x leverage is safer than 3x but still not suitable for long-term buy-and-hold

📊 Data-Based Take: SSO has the lower fee

Whether the lower-cost fund suits your situation depends on your existing holdings, account type, tax situation, and how you use each fund. This is a cost comparison, not a personalized recommendation.

✓ Reviewed by a CFA® Charterholder · Data as of Jul 14, 2026 · Educational only, not financial advice

QLD

ProShares Ultra QQQ

Expense Ratio

0.95%

1-Year Return

+57.1%

AUM

$14.6B

Holdings

101

SSO

ProShares Ultra S&P500

Expense Ratio

0.89% ✓

1-Year Return

+37.9%

AUM

$8.0B

Holdings

503

📋 QLD vs SSO — Key Facts Side by Side

Metric	QLD	SSO
Fund Name	ProShares Ultra QQQ	ProShares Ultra S&P500
Issuer	ProShares	ProShares
Tracks Index	Nasdaq-100 Index (2x)	S&P 500 Index (2x)
Expense Ratio	0.95%	0.89% ✓
Cost per $10K/yr	$95.00	$89.00
AUM	$14.6B	$8.0B
Holdings	101	503
Inception	2006	2006
1-Year Return	+57.07%	+37.94%
3-Year Return	+43.71%	+34.87%
5-Year Return	+20.37%	+17.87%
Dividend Yield	0.12%	0.67%
Holdings Overlap	See holdings overlap →
Avg Bid-Ask Spread	0.02%	0.02%

Expense ratio, AUM, and returns updated Jul 14, 2026 from ETF BFF database. Returns are annualised. Not investment advice.

📊 QLD vs SSO — Annualised Returns

Annualised returns (trailing, price-based). Past performance does not guarantee future results.

🎯 Which Fund Fits Which Investor?

Often fits investors who...

QLD

want tech-heavy large-cap growth exposure via Nasdaq-100 Index (2x)

Often fits investors who...

SSO

want the lowest fees: saves ~$6/yr per $10K vs QLD
want broader diversification (503 holdings vs 101)
want focused large-cap US stock exposure via S&P 500 Index (2x)

💰 What the Fee Difference Actually Costs

Adjust the numbers for your situation. This models each fund's expense ratio compounding against your balance over time.

Investment amount$ Years held Expected annual return%

Assumes a constant annual return reinvested, with each fund's expense ratio deducted yearly. Illustrative only; actual returns vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

⚙️ Want the Full Interactive Comparison?

Side-by-side holdings overlap, sector breakdown, and live performance tabs, all in one place.

Run Full QLD vs SSO Comparison → Free · No signup · Instant results

📧 Free Weekly Newsletter

Leveraged ETFs: the risks most investors discover too late

Decay, rebalancing drag, and when they actually make sense — the ETF BFF newsletter gives you the full picture.

Free to learn forever · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime

✅ You're in! Check your inbox for your first issue.

❓ QLD vs SSO — Frequently Asked Questions

Is QLD or SSO better for long-term holding?

Neither is designed for traditional long-term buy-and-hold. Both reset daily, creating volatility decay over time. That said, some research suggests that 2x leveraged ETFs on broadly diversified indices (like SSO on the S&P 500) have historically generated higher long-term returns than the unleveraged index, at the cost of significantly worse drawdowns. This strategy requires iron nerves to hold through 50-70% drawdowns without selling. QLD on the more volatile Nasdaq-100 carries even more decay and drawdown risk.

What is the difference between QLD and TQQQ?

QLD provides 2x daily leverage on the Nasdaq-100; TQQQ provides 3x. TQQQ is proportionally more volatile and decays faster. In the 2022 bear market, TQQQ fell ~80% while QLD fell ~60%. If you want leveraged Nasdaq exposure but less extreme risk than TQQQ, QLD is the middle ground. See our TQQQ vs UPRO comparison for the 3x leveraged comparison.

Does volatility decay really matter for 2x ETFs?

Decay matters more for 3x than 2x, but it still applies. In high-volatility markets, a 2x ETF can lag 2x the index return. In trending bull markets, decay is minimal and the leveraged return is close to 2x. The key insight: 2x ETFs reward trend-following in bull markets and punish buy-and-hold in volatile or bear markets. Understanding the market regime is important for managing these positions.

What expense ratio makes sense for a leveraged ETF?

Leveraged ETFs are inherently more expensive than plain-vanilla funds because they use derivatives (swaps, futures) to achieve daily leverage. QLD at 0.95% and SSO at 0.89% are typical for 2x funds. Compare to QQQ at 0.20% and VOO at 0.03%. The fee matters less than the derivative financing cost embedded in the leverage reset. In high-rate environments, this embedded cost rises. The total cost of leverage is higher than just the expense ratio.

Can I use QLD or SSO in a tax-advantaged account?

Yes. Leveraged ETFs can be held in IRAs and 401(k)s if your plan allows them. Tax-advantaged accounts are actually a slightly better environment for leveraged ETFs because you avoid the short-term capital gains taxes generated by frequent internal rebalancing. However, the risk profile is unchanged: a 60% drawdown in an IRA account is still a 60% drawdown.

New to ETF investing? See answers to the most common ETF questions →

📄 QLD & SSO Fact Sheets

QLD Fact Sheet→ SSO Fact Sheet→

ℹ️ Data shown is for educational purposes and may not reflect the most current figures. Returns are trailing price-based and exclude dividend reinvestment. Past performance does not guarantee future results. ETF BFF is not a licensed financial advisor — this is not personalized financial advice.