⚖️ SCHG vs QQQ Comparison · Free & No Signup

SCHG vs QQQ: The Cheap Growth ETF vs the Famous Nasdaq Brand

SCHG and QQQ both tilt heavily toward mega-cap US growth names. SCHG charges 0.04%; QQQ charges 0.20%. For a long-term holder, the fee difference matters.

💰 SCHG is cheaper 🔬 Compare top 10 holdings → 💡 Plain-English verdict
🤝 BFF Take
SCHG Wins on Cost — QQQ Has Stronger Brand and Options Liquidity

SCHG (Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust) are both large-cap US growth ETFs with significant overlap in top holdings — Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Amazon dominate both. But they are not identical: QQQ specifically tracks the Nasdaq-100 (101 stocks from the Nasdaq exchange, including non-tech names like Amazon, Tesla, and Costco). SCHG tracks the Dow Jones US Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index (~230 stocks, any US large-cap exchange). SCHG charges 0.04%; QQQ charges 0.20% — a 16 basis point gap that on $100K amounts to $160/year more in fees for QQQ. For long-term investors who want US growth exposure without paying for QQQ's brand and options market infrastructure, SCHG is an excellent alternative.

📋 Quick Takeaways
💰SCHG costs 0.04% vs QQQ's 0.20% — 5x cheaper for similar large-cap US growth exposure
📊QQQ tracks Nasdaq-100 (101 stocks); SCHG tracks large-cap US growth broadly (~230 stocks) — different universe
🎯QQQ is the dominant vehicle for growth-focused options trading — the only reason to pay its higher fee
📊 Data-Based Take: SCHG has the lower fee

Whether the lower-cost fund suits your situation depends on your existing holdings, account type, tax situation, and how you use each fund. This is a cost comparison, not a personalized recommendation.

Reviewed by a CFA® Charterholder · Data as of Jul 14, 2026 · Educational only, not financial advice
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Expense Ratio
0.04% ✓
1-Year Return
+17.7%
AUM
$59.1B
Holdings
230
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust
Expense Ratio
0.20%
1-Year Return
+30.4%
AUM
$490.1B
Holdings
101

📋 SCHG vs QQQ — Key Facts Side by Side

Metric SCHG QQQ
Fund Name Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF Invesco QQQ Trust
Issuer Schwab Invesco
Tracks Index Dow Jones US Large-Cap Growth Nasdaq-100
Expense Ratio 0.04% ✓ 0.20%
Cost per $10K/yr $4.00 $20.00
AUM $59.1B $490.1B
Holdings 230 101
Inception 2009 1999
1-Year Return +17.66% +30.44%
3-Year Return +23.57% +26.19%
5-Year Return +13.55% +15.60%
Dividend Yield 0.39% 0.41%
Holdings Overlap See holdings overlap →
Avg Bid-Ask Spread 0.01% 0.00%

Expense ratio, AUM, and returns updated Jul 14, 2026 from ETF BFF database. Returns are annualised. Not investment advice.

📊 SCHG vs QQQ — Annualised Returns

Annualised returns (trailing, price-based). Past performance does not guarantee future results.

🎯 Which Fund Fits Which Investor?

Often fits investors who...
SCHG
  • want the lowest fees: saves ~$16/yr per $10K vs QQQ
  • want broader diversification (230 holdings vs 101)
  • want tech-heavy large-cap growth exposure via Dow Jones US Large-Cap Growth
Often fits investors who...
QQQ
  • want tech-heavy large-cap growth exposure via Nasdaq-100
  • already use Invesco and prefer staying within one fund family

💰 What the Fee Difference Actually Costs

Adjust the numbers for your situation. This models each fund's expense ratio compounding against your balance over time.

Assumes a constant annual return reinvested, with each fund's expense ratio deducted yearly. Illustrative only; actual returns vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

⚙️ Want the Full Interactive Comparison?

Side-by-side holdings overlap, sector breakdown, and live performance tabs, all in one place.

Run Full SCHG vs QQQ Comparison → Free · No signup · Instant results
📧 Free Weekly Newsletter

Get smarter about ETFs — one concept a week, free forever

The ETF BFF newsletter breaks down one ETF concept per week — clear, jargon-free, and actually useful.

Free to learn forever · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime

✅ You're in! Check your inbox for your first issue.

❓ SCHG vs QQQ — Frequently Asked Questions

SCHG tracks the Dow Jones US Large-Cap Growth index — selecting large US companies classified as growth regardless of which stock exchange they trade on. QQQ tracks the Nasdaq-100 — the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange. SCHG is broader (~230 stocks); QQQ is more concentrated (101 stocks). Both are dominated by the same mega-cap growth companies, but the selection methodology differs.
Performance has been very similar over comparable periods, with small differences driven by index composition. In periods when non-Nasdaq growth companies outperformed, SCHG had an edge; when Nasdaq-specific names dominated (often driven by Amazon, Tesla, and Costco), QQQ benefited. SCHG's lower fee gives it a structural advantage that compounds over time.
In a tax-advantaged account like an IRA, switching from QQQ to SCHG is costless from a tax perspective and saves 16 basis points annually. Over 20 years on a $100K position, that's approximately $3,500 in cumulative fee savings. If you don't need QQQ's options market liquidity, switching to SCHG (or QQQM at 0.15%) makes financial sense.
There's significant overlap at the top — both hold Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Meta, Alphabet, and Amazon as top positions. However, QQQ exclusively holds Nasdaq-listed companies; SCHG holds growth companies across NYSE and Nasdaq. SCHG includes large-cap growth companies that don't trade on Nasdaq; QQQ includes large Nasdaq-listed non-growth companies (like Costco and Tesla) that might not make SCHG's growth screen.
QQQM (Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF) is the cheaper version of QQQ at 0.15% — if you specifically want the Nasdaq-100 index, QQQM is better than QQQ. SCHG at 0.04% is cheaper still, but tracks a different index. The choice is whether you want specifically the Nasdaq-100 (QQQM) or broader US large-cap growth (SCHG). Both are worth considering over QQQ for long-term investors.

New to ETF investing? See answers to the most common ETF questions →

📄 SCHG & QQQ Fact Sheets

SCHG Fact Sheet QQQ Fact Sheet
ℹ️ Data shown is for educational purposes and may not reflect the most current figures. Returns are trailing price-based and exclude dividend reinvestment. Past performance does not guarantee future results. ETF BFF is not a licensed financial advisor — this is not personalized financial advice.