⚖️ VTI vs VOO Comparison · Free & No Signup

VTI vs VOO: 3,600 Stocks vs 500 — Same Price

Both cost the same 0.03% per year. The difference is breadth: VTI covers the entire US stock market while VOO focuses on the 500 largest companies. For a decades-long retirement holder, that breadth is the whole decision.

🔬 Compare top 10 holdings → 💡 Plain-English verdict
🤝 BFF Take
A Genuine Toss-Up — And for Retirement, Either One Works

VTI and VOO charge identical 0.03% expense ratios, so cost doesn't decide this one. VTI holds roughly 3,600+ US stocks — including small- and mid-cap companies — while VOO holds only the 500 largest. In practice, because mega-cap stocks dominate both indexes by weight, VTI and VOO tend to move almost in lockstep: their 10-year correlation is above 0.99. The question is whether you want exposure to smaller companies that could outperform over long cycles. For a long-term retirement portfolio, that time horizon actually tilts the odds slightly toward VTI: the longer you hold, the more room small- and mid-caps have to add their historical (if inconsistent) premium, and you never have to bolt on a separate small-cap fund later. But the difference is small — either fund is a completely valid single-holding core for a retirement account. If you want the broadest possible US diversification, VTI edges out VOO. If you want the simplest, most stable large-cap core, VOO is perfectly sufficient.

📋 Quick Takeaways
💰Identical cost — both charge 0.03%/yr (~$3/yr per $10K). This is not a cost decision.
🔄High overlap (~85%+) because large-caps dominate VTI by weight — they move nearly identically day-to-day
🎯VTI for maximum US breadth (includes small/mid-cap); VOO for pure large-cap S&P 500 exposure
🏖️For retirement/long horizons, VTI's small- and mid-cap slice is a slight edge — but both are valid one-fund cores

Both funds trade commission-free at every major brokerage. Where to buy them →

✓ ETF BFF Editorial Team · Data as of Oct 14, 2026 · Educational only, not financial advice
VTI
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Expense Ratio
0.03%
1-Year Return
+16.2%
AUM
$2,202.6B
Holdings
3,642
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Expense Ratio
0.03%
1-Year Return
+17.0%
AUM
$1,600.2B
Holdings
503

📋 VTI vs VOO: Key Facts Side by Side

Metric VTI VOO
Fund Name Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Issuer Vanguard Vanguard
Tracks Index CRSP US Total Market S&P 500
Expense Ratio 0.03% 0.03%
Cost per $10K/yr $3.00 $3.00
AUM $2,202.6B $1,600.2B
Holdings 3,642 503
Inception 2001 2010
1-Year Return +16.20% +16.96%
3-Year Return +22.68% +23.07%
5-Year Return +12.74% +13.98%
Dividend Yield 1.06% 1.06%
Holdings Overlap ~85% by weight (S&P 500 stocks make up ~85% of VTI) — see full overlap →
Avg Bid-Ask Spread 0.00% 0.00%

AUM and returns updated Oct 14, 2026 from ETF BFF database; expense ratios verified against issuer filings. Returns are annualised. Not investment advice.

Free one-page checklist

Comparing two ETFs? Grab the free checklist.

The seven things that actually decide a comparison: the index, fee, overlap, tax, liquidity, concentration, and structure. One printable page.

No spam · Unsubscribe anytime · Your download opens instantly

Open your checklist →

Your download is ready above. We also emailed a confirmation link, click it to get The Expense Report, our weekly ETF newsletter.

📊 VTI vs VOO: Annualised Returns

Annualised returns (trailing, price-based). Past performance does not guarantee future results.

🎯 Which Fund Fits Which Investor?

Often fits investors who...
VTI
  • want broader diversification (3,642 holdings vs 503)
  • want the entire US stock market: large, mid, and small cap in one fund
Often fits investors who...
VOO
  • want focused large-cap US stock exposure via S&P 500

💰 What the Fee Difference Actually Costs

Adjust the numbers for your situation. This models each fund's expense ratio compounding against your balance over time.

Assumes a constant annual return reinvested, with each fund's expense ratio deducted yearly. Illustrative only; actual returns vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

⚙️ Want the Full Interactive Comparison?

Side-by-side holdings overlap, sector breakdown, and live performance tabs, all in one place.

Run Full VTI vs VOO Comparison → Free · No signup · Instant results

❓ VTI vs VOO: Frequently Asked Questions

VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index and holds approximately 3,600+ US stocks including large, mid, and small-cap companies. VOO tracks the S&P 500 and holds only the 500 largest US companies. Both charge 0.03% expense ratio. Because large-cap stocks dominate the US market by weight, VTI and VOO behave very similarly — their long-term returns are nearly identical — but VTI offers slightly broader diversification.
Over most 10-year periods, VOO has slightly outperformed VTI because large-cap stocks (which make up most of both funds) have dominated small and mid-cap stocks since 2010. However, in periods when smaller companies outperform — as they historically did from 2000–2010 — VTI's broader exposure provides an advantage. Neither is guaranteed to outperform the other; the difference is primarily diversification, not expected return.
Both are excellent choices for a Roth IRA. VTI's broader diversification (including small and mid-cap stocks) is slightly preferable in a tax-advantaged account where you're investing for decades, since small-cap stocks have historically provided higher long-run returns — though with more volatility. That said, VOO is also a perfectly valid single-fund Roth IRA holding. Many financial planners consider them interchangeable for most individual investors.
For a long-term retirement portfolio, both work as a single-fund US core, and the decision is close. The edge tips slightly to VTI: over a multi-decade horizon its small- and mid-cap holdings have more time to contribute their historical return premium, and holding the whole market means you never need to add a separate small-cap fund later. VOO (S&P 500 only) is simpler and has actually outperformed VTI over the large-cap-led 2010s, so it is far from a wrong choice. Practical guidance: pick one and hold it — owning both adds almost no diversification because VTI already contains every VOO stock. If you are within ~10 years of retirement, the more important decision is not VTI vs VOO but how much to shift from stocks toward bonds; see our bond and treasury ETF guides for that side of the glidepath.
Holding both provides minimal diversification benefit because VTI already includes all the stocks in VOO plus thousands more. If you own both, you're effectively doubling your large-cap S&P 500 exposure (which is the dominant weight in VTI) without meaningfully increasing your exposure to small and mid-cap stocks. If your goal is broad US diversification, just owning VTI alone accomplishes that more cleanly.

New to ETF investing? See answers to the most common ETF questions →

📄 VTI & VOO Fact Sheets

VTI Fact Sheet→ VOO Fact Sheet→
ℹ️ Data shown is for educational purposes and may not reflect the most current figures. Returns are trailing price-based and exclude dividend reinvestment. Past performance does not guarantee future results. ETF BFF is not a licensed financial advisor. This is not personalized financial advice.