⚖️ XBI vs IBB Comparison · Free & No Signup

XBI vs IBB: Equal-Weight Small Biotech vs Large-Cap Biotech — Big Difference

XBI weights each biotech equally — more small-cap exposure, higher volatility, bigger potential swings. IBB concentrates in mega-cap names like Amgen and Gilead. Same sector, very different funds.

💰 XBI is cheaper 🔬 Compare top 10 holdings → 💡 Plain-English verdict
🤝 BFF Take
XBI for Small-Cap Biotech Bets — IBB for Large-Cap Biotech Stability

XBI (SPDR S&P Biotech ETF) and IBB (iShares Biotechnology ETF) both target US biotech but with dramatically different approaches. XBI uses equal weighting across ~130 stocks — giving small clinical-stage biotechs the same weight as billion-dollar companies. This makes XBI much more volatile but also more sensitive to small-cap biotech catalyst events (FDA approvals, trial results). IBB is market-cap weighted, so Amgen, Gilead, and Regeneron dominate — giving it more large-cap stability. XBI costs 0.35%; IBB costs 0.44%. XBI is for traders and aggressive investors who want full biotech exposure including small-caps. IBB is for investors who want biotech exposure weighted toward established revenue-generating companies.

📋 Quick Takeaways
⚗️XBI equal-weights ~130 biotechs — small-cap clinical-stage companies get equal influence as large caps
🏢IBB market-cap weights — Amgen, Gilead, Regeneron dominate; more like large-cap pharma than pure biotech
💰XBI costs 0.35% vs IBB's 0.44% — XBI is also cheaper with broader small-cap exposure
📊 Data-Based Take: XBI has the lower fee

Whether the lower-cost fund suits your situation depends on your existing holdings, account type, tax situation, and how you use each fund. This is a cost comparison, not a personalized recommendation.

Reviewed by a CFA® Charterholder · Data updated Jun 2026 · Educational only, not financial advice
XBI
SPDR S&P Biotech ETF
Expense Ratio
0.35% ✓
1-Year Return
+4.2%
AUM
$6B
Holdings
130
IBB
iShares Biotechnology ETF
Expense Ratio
0.44%
1-Year Return
+6.8%
AUM
$8B
Holdings
220

📋 XBI vs IBB — Key Facts Side by Side

Metric XBI IBB
Fund Name SPDR S&P Biotech ETF iShares Biotechnology ETF
Issuer State Street iShares
Tracks Index S&P Biotechnology Select Industry NYSE Arca Biotechnology
Expense Ratio 0.35% ✓ 0.44%
Cost per $10K/yr $35.00 $44.00
AUM $6B $8B
Holdings 130 220
Inception 2006 2001
1-Year Return +4.20% +6.80%
3-Year Return -8.40% -3.20%
5-Year Return +1.80% +3.40%
Avg Bid-Ask Spread 0.01% 0.01%

Data from ETF BFF database. Returns are annualised. Not investment advice.

📊 XBI vs IBB — Annualised Returns

Annualised returns (trailing, price-based). Past performance does not guarantee future results.

🎯 Should You Buy XBI or IBB?

Choose if...
XBI
  • You want the lowest fees — saves ~$9/yr per $10K vs IBB
  • You already use State Street and prefer staying within their fund family
Choose if...
IBB
  • You want broader diversification (220 holdings vs 130)
  • You already use iShares and prefer staying within their fund family

⚙️ Want the Full Interactive Comparison?

Top holdings comparison, sector breakdown, 30-year cost impact calculator, and more — all in one place.

Run Full XBI vs IBB Comparison → Free · No signup · Instant results
📧 Free Weekly Newsletter

Get smarter about ETFs — one concept a week, free forever

The ETF BFF newsletter breaks down one ETF concept per week — clear, jargon-free, and actually useful.

Free to learn forever · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime

✅ You're in! Check your inbox for your first issue.

❓ XBI vs IBB — Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference between XBI and IBB?
The key difference is weighting methodology. XBI uses equal weighting — every stock in the index gets roughly the same allocation. This means a tiny clinical-stage biotech with no revenue has the same weight as Amgen. IBB uses market-cap weighting — larger companies get larger allocations. This makes IBB behave more like a large-cap healthcare ETF, while XBI is a purer bet on the entire biotech ecosystem including small companies.
Which is more volatile — XBI or IBB?
XBI is consistently more volatile than IBB due to its equal-weight approach giving meaningful exposure to small-cap and clinical-stage biotechs. A single FDA approval or rejection in a small holding can cause XBI to spike or crash 2-5% in a day. IBB's large-cap dominance dampens individual stock impacts. In biotech bull markets, XBI typically outperforms; in biotech bear markets, XBI falls harder.
Is biotech a good long-term investment?
Biotech has been one of the most volatile sector ETFs over the past decade, with massive boom-bust cycles tied to drug approvals, clinical trial results, and interest rate sensitivity (biotech companies often burn cash and rely on capital markets). The long-term demographic and innovation tailwinds are real, but execution risk in individual companies is high. Both XBI and IBB have lagged the S&P 500 over most 5 and 10-year periods despite the compelling sector narrative.
Does IBB or XBI pay dividends?
Neither XBI nor IBB pays meaningful dividends. Biotech companies reinvest capital into R&D rather than distributions. Any dividend yield on these ETFs is incidental and very small. They are total-return vehicles driven almost entirely by price appreciation (or decline) rather than income.
What are the biggest holdings in XBI vs IBB?
In IBB, the top holdings are large-caps: Amgen, Gilead Sciences, Regeneron, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, and Moderna typically make up 30-40% of the fund. In XBI, no single stock exceeds 2-3% due to equal weighting — the top positions are often mid-cap or small-cap names that rotate frequently based on rebalancing. This makes XBI much harder to predict from a holdings perspective.

New to ETF investing? See answers to the most common ETF questions →

📄 XBI & IBB Fact Sheets

XBI Fact Sheet IBB Fact Sheet
ℹ️ Data shown is for educational purposes and may not reflect the most current figures. Returns are trailing price-based and exclude dividend reinvestment. Past performance does not guarantee future results. ETF BFF is not a licensed financial advisor — this is not personalized financial advice.