⚖️ CIBR vs HACK Comparison · Free & No Signup

CIBR vs HACK: The Two Leading Cybersecurity ETFs Compared

CIBR and HACK are the top two pure-play cybersecurity ETFs. Both charge 0.60%, hold similar names, and have roughly comparable performance. The differences are subtle but worth knowing.

🔬 Compare top 10 holdings → 💡 Plain-English verdict
🤝 BFF Take
CIBR Is Larger: HACK Is Older With Slightly More Diversification

CIBR (First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF) and HACK (ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF) are both pure-play cybersecurity ETFs targeting the same theme. CIBR tracks the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index of ~35 companies focused on infrastructure protection, network security, and cyber services. HACK tracks the Prime Cyber Defense Index of ~60 companies including some defense/government contractors alongside traditional cybersecurity names. Both charge exactly 0.60%. CIBR has grown to $6B+ in AUM and has more liquidity; HACK is the original cybersecurity ETF (launched 2014) with $1.5B in AUM. Performance is similar but CIBR has had a slight edge over recent periods. For most investors, CIBR's larger size and liquidity make it the default choice in this category.

📋 Quick Takeaways
🔒CIBR holds ~35 pure-play cybersecurity companies; $6B+ AUM makes it the largest cyber ETF
🛡️HACK holds ~60 companies including defense contractors, a broader definition of "cyber defense"
💰Both charge exactly 0.60%, so fee is not a differentiator; liquidity and AUM favor CIBR
📊 Data-Based Take: CIBR has the lower fee

Whether the lower-cost fund suits your situation depends on your existing holdings, account type, tax situation, and how you use each fund. This is a cost comparison, not a personalized recommendation.

Reviewed by a CFA® Charterholder · Data as of Jul 14, 2026 · Educational only, not financial advice
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Expense Ratio
0.60%
1-Year Return
+25.5%
AUM
$13.8B
Holdings
35
HACK
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF
Expense Ratio
0.60%
1-Year Return
+30.0%
AUM
$2.6B
Holdings
60

📋 CIBR vs HACK — Key Facts Side by Side

Metric CIBR HACK
Fund Name First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF Amplify Cybersecurity ETF
Issuer First Trust ETFMG
Tracks Index Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Prime Cyber Defense
Expense Ratio 0.60% 0.60%
Cost per $10K/yr $60.00 $60.00
AUM $13.8B $2.6B
Holdings 35 60
Inception 2015 2014
1-Year Return +25.50% +29.99%
3-Year Return +28.92% +31.28%
5-Year Return +14.77% +12.53%
Dividend Yield 0.44% 0.06%
Holdings Overlap See holdings overlap →
Avg Bid-Ask Spread 0.02% 0.03%

Expense ratio, AUM, and returns updated Jul 14, 2026 from ETF BFF database. Returns are annualised. Not investment advice.

📊 CIBR vs HACK — Annualised Returns

Annualised returns (trailing, price-based). Past performance does not guarantee future results.

🎯 Which Fund Fits Which Investor?

Often fits investors who...
CIBR
  • already use First Trust and prefer staying within one fund family
Often fits investors who...
HACK
  • want broader diversification (60 holdings vs 35)
  • already use ETFMG and prefer staying within one fund family

💰 What the Fee Difference Actually Costs

Adjust the numbers for your situation. This models each fund's expense ratio compounding against your balance over time.

Assumes a constant annual return reinvested, with each fund's expense ratio deducted yearly. Illustrative only; actual returns vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

🧩 What CIBR and HACK Actually Hold in Common

Among their top holdings, CIBR and HACK hold 8 of the same companies: Palo Alto Networks Inc, Fortinet Inc, CrowdStrike Holdings Inc Class A, Cisco Systems Inc, Broadcom Inc, Cloudflare Inc, among others.

CIBR · top holdings
  • Palo Alto Networks Inc 9.6%
  • Fortinet Inc 8.8%
  • CrowdStrike Holdings Inc Class A 8.3%
  • Cisco Systems Inc 7.7%
  • Broadcom Inc 6.7%
  • Cloudflare Inc 4.0%
  • Okta Inc Class A 3.5%
  • F5 Inc 3.4%
  • Zscaler Inc 3.0%
  • Akamai Technologies Inc 2.8%
HACK · top holdings
  • Palo Alto Networks Inc 6.6%
  • Broadcom Inc 6.0%
  • Cisco Systems Inc 5.8%
  • CrowdStrike Holdings Inc Class A 5.5%
  • Fortinet Inc 5.4%
  • General Dynamics Corp 4.9%
  • Cloudflare Inc 4.8%
  • Okta Inc Class A 4.4%
  • F5 Inc 4.3%
  • Northrop Grumman Corp 4.3%

Based on each fund's largest disclosed holdings. Names marked • are held by both. Weights shift over time. For overlap beyond the top holdings shown here, the holdings overlap tool shows the full picture.

⚙️ Want the Full Interactive Comparison?

Side-by-side holdings overlap, sector breakdown, and live performance tabs, all in one place.

Run Full CIBR vs HACK Comparison → Free · No signup · Instant results
📧 Free Weekly Newsletter

Get smarter about ETFs — one concept a week, free forever

The ETF BFF newsletter breaks down one ETF concept per week — clear, jargon-free, and actually useful.

Free to learn forever · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime

✅ You're in! Check your inbox for your first issue.

❓ CIBR vs HACK — Frequently Asked Questions

CIBR focuses on companies that derive significant revenue from cybersecurity products and services: software, hardware, and services for network/data security. HACK uses a broader "cyber defense" definition that includes some defense and government IT contractors alongside traditional cybersecurity companies. CIBR has ~35 holdings vs HACK's ~60, making CIBR more concentrated in pure cybersecurity names. CIBR has larger AUM and better liquidity.
Cybersecurity spending grows structurally: ransomware, data breaches, AI-driven threats, and regulatory requirements drive continuous IT security investment. The sector has delivered reasonable growth, though as with all thematic ETFs, the story is well-known and priced in to some extent. Both CIBR and HACK have lagged the S&P 500 over most recent periods but outperformed in specific cybersecurity supercycles.
CIBR's top holdings typically include Palo Alto Networks, CrowdStrike, Fortinet, Zscaler, Cisco (security segment), and similar enterprise cybersecurity leaders. These large-cap names tend to dominate CIBR's market-cap weighting. HACK has similar top holdings but with some additional mid-cap and government IT contractor names in the mix.
Cybersecurity ETFs have been volatile relative to the S&P 500. They outperformed strongly in 2020-2021 during the remote work/cloud security boom, underperformed significantly in the 2022 rate-hike environment (high-multiple growth stocks fell hardest), and partially recovered in 2023-2024. The sector's performance is tied closely to growth stock multiples. When rates rise, cybersecurity companies with high P/E ratios get hit.
BUG (Global X Cybersecurity ETF) charges 0.50%, slightly cheaper than CIBR and HACK. However, BUG has much less AUM and liquidity. IHAK (iShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETF) charges 0.47% with moderate AUM. For most investors, CIBR's liquidity advantage at 0.60% outweighs the modest fee savings from smaller, less liquid alternatives.

New to ETF investing? See answers to the most common ETF questions →

📄 CIBR & HACK Fact Sheets

CIBR Fact Sheet HACK Fact Sheet
ℹ️ Data shown is for educational purposes and may not reflect the most current figures. Returns are trailing price-based and exclude dividend reinvestment. Past performance does not guarantee future results. ETF BFF is not a licensed financial advisor — this is not personalized financial advice.