🤝 BFF Take
Different Philosophies — COWZ Has Outperformed But Costs Far More
COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) both tilt toward "value" stocks but define value very differently. VTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index — 340 large-cap US stocks that screen as value based on price-to-book, price-to-earnings, and similar metrics. It charges 0.04%, making it one of the cheapest value ETFs available. COWZ takes a different approach: it screens the Russell 1000 for the 100 companies with the highest free cash flow yield and rebalances quarterly. This active selection philosophy has driven strong returns but costs 0.49% — more than 12x VTV's expense ratio. COWZ outperformed VTV meaningfully from 2020-2023, but investors pay significantly for that approach.
📋 Quick Takeaways
🐄COWZ selects 100 stocks by free cash flow yield — a cash-generation quality screen, not traditional value metrics
💰VTV costs 0.04%; COWZ costs 0.49% — COWZ is 12x more expensive
📈COWZ has outperformed VTV in recent years — but the much higher fee creates a high performance hurdle to justify the cost
📊 Data-Based Take: VTV has the lower fee
Whether the lower-cost fund suits your situation depends on your existing holdings, account type, tax situation, and how you use each fund. This is a cost comparison, not a personalized recommendation.
✓
Reviewed by a CFA® Charterholder · Data updated Jun 2026 · Educational only, not financial advice
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
📋 COWZ vs VTV — Key Facts Side by Side
| Metric |
COWZ |
VTV |
| Fund Name |
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF |
Vanguard Value ETF |
| Issuer |
Pacer |
Vanguard |
| Tracks Index |
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 |
CRSP US Large Cap Value |
| Expense Ratio |
0.49% |
0.04% ✓ |
| Cost per $10K/yr |
$49.00 |
$4.00 |
| AUM |
$25B |
$120B |
| Holdings |
100 |
340 |
| Inception |
2016 |
2004 |
| 1-Year Return |
+14.60% |
+11.90% |
| 3-Year Return |
+12.80% |
+9.10% |
| 5-Year Return |
+15.20% |
+11.80% |
| Avg Bid-Ask Spread |
0.01% |
0.00% |
Data from ETF BFF database. Returns are annualised. Not investment advice.
📊 COWZ vs VTV — Annualised Returns
Annualised returns (trailing, price-based). Past performance does not guarantee future results.
🎯 Should You Buy COWZ or VTV?
Choose if...
COWZ
- You want focused large-cap US stock exposure via Pacer US Cash Cows 100
- You already use Pacer and prefer staying within their fund family
Choose if...
VTV
- You want the lowest fees — saves ~$45/yr per $10K vs COWZ
- You want broader diversification (340 holdings vs 100)
- You want focused large-cap US stock exposure via CRSP US Large Cap Value
📧 Free Weekly Newsletter
Get smarter about ETFs — one concept a week, free forever
The ETF BFF newsletter breaks down one ETF concept per week — clear, jargon-free, and actually useful.
✅ You're in! Check your inbox for your first issue.
❓ COWZ vs VTV — Frequently Asked Questions
What is COWZ and how does it work?
COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) takes the Russell 1000 universe and selects the 100 companies with the highest trailing 12-month free cash flow yield (free cash flow divided by enterprise value). Holdings are weighted by free cash flow yield. The portfolio rebalances quarterly. The strategy is designed to find highly profitable, cash-generating businesses trading at reasonable valuations — distinct from traditional price-to-book or P/E based value screens.
Is COWZ worth the 0.49% expense ratio vs VTV's 0.04%?
That depends on whether COWZ's outperformance persists. COWZ has delivered strong returns since its 2016 launch, and its free cash flow screen has academic support as a quality indicator. However, 0.49% creates a significant hurdle: COWZ needs to outperform VTV by nearly half a percentage point per year just to break even on fees. Long-term, whether active factor screens beat passive indexing is an open question. VTV's near-zero cost is a guaranteed advantage.
How does VTV compare to SCHV or IVE?
VTV, SCHV, and IVE are all large-cap value ETFs using traditional metrics. VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value; SCHV tracks Dow Jones US Large-Cap Value; IVE tracks the S&P 500 Value index. All charge between 0.04% and 0.18% and have very similar performance. VTV is the largest and most widely held. Differences are minor — pick based on cost and your brokerage.
What is free cash flow yield and why does COWZ care about it?
Free cash flow (FCF) is the cash a company generates after capital expenditures — essentially how much real money the business produces. FCF yield is FCF divided by enterprise value (market cap + debt - cash). A high FCF yield means you're getting a lot of cash generation relative to what you're paying. This metric screens for financially strong, genuinely profitable businesses — filtering out companies that look cheap on earnings but burn cash.
Is COWZ appropriate for a long-term portfolio?
COWZ can be a legitimate satellite holding for investors who believe in free cash flow quality as an investment screen. Its 0.49% fee and quarterly rebalancing make it more expensive and potentially less tax-efficient than passive alternatives. It's best viewed as a deliberate active tilt, not a core holding. For most investors building a long-term portfolio, VTV or a low-cost value index serves as a better core value position.
New to ETF investing? See answers to the most common ETF questions →
ℹ️ Data shown is for educational purposes and may not reflect the most current figures. Returns are trailing price-based and exclude dividend reinvestment. Past performance does not guarantee future results. ETF BFF is not a licensed financial advisor — this is not personalized financial advice.