⚖️ VTV vs SCHV Comparison · Free & No Signup

VTV vs SCHV: Two Identical-Cost Large-Cap Value ETFs

Both charge 0.04% and target US large-cap value stocks. The index methodology differs slightly — but for most investors, these are perfectly interchangeable.

🔬 Compare top 10 holdings → 💡 Plain-English verdict
🤝 BFF Take
Pick Based on Your Brokerage — VTV Has 6x More Assets

VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) and SCHV (Schwab US Large-Cap Value ETF) are both large-cap US value ETFs with identical 0.04% expense ratios. VTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index (~340 stocks) with $120B+ in assets — it's one of the largest value ETFs in existence. SCHV tracks the Dow Jones US Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index (~340 stocks) with about $20B in assets. Both hold the largest US companies that screen as value on metrics like price-to-book, price-to-earnings, and price-to-sales. Top holdings overlap heavily: Berkshire Hathaway, JPMorgan, ExxonMobil, and Johnson & Johnson typically appear in both. For Schwab investors, SCHV fits naturally; for everyone else, VTV's higher liquidity is a marginal advantage.

📋 Quick Takeaways
🔄Same 0.04% expense ratio and large-cap value focus — functionally interchangeable for most investors
🏦VTV has $120B+ AUM vs SCHV's $20B — VTV has 6x more assets and meaningfully better liquidity
📊Both hold ~340 large-cap value stocks; top holdings overlap heavily — Berkshire, JPMorgan, Exxon, J&J
📊 Data-Based Take: VTV has the lower fee

Whether the lower-cost fund suits your situation depends on your existing holdings, account type, tax situation, and how you use each fund. This is a cost comparison, not a personalized recommendation.

Reviewed by a CFA® Charterholder · Data as of Jul 14, 2026 · Educational only, not financial advice
VTV
Vanguard Value Index Fund ETF Shares
Expense Ratio
0.04%
1-Year Return
+22.8%
AUM
$237.8B
Holdings
340
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
Expense Ratio
0.04%
1-Year Return
+22.6%
AUM
$15.9B
Holdings
340

📋 VTV vs SCHV — Key Facts Side by Side

Metric VTV SCHV
Fund Name Vanguard Value Index Fund ETF Shares Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
Issuer Vanguard Schwab
Tracks Index CRSP US Large Cap Value Dow Jones US Large-Cap Value
Expense Ratio 0.04% 0.04%
Cost per $10K/yr $4.00 $4.00
AUM $237.8B $15.9B
Holdings 340 340
Inception 2004 2009
1-Year Return +22.84% +22.56%
3-Year Return +18.46% +18.40%
5-Year Return +12.27% +10.87%
Dividend Yield 1.88% 1.75%
Holdings Overlap See holdings overlap →
Avg Bid-Ask Spread 0.00% 0.01%

Expense ratio, AUM, and returns updated Jul 14, 2026 from ETF BFF database. Returns are annualised. Not investment advice.

📊 VTV vs SCHV — Annualised Returns

Annualised returns (trailing, price-based). Past performance does not guarantee future results.

🎯 Which Fund Fits Which Investor?

Often fits investors who...
VTV
  • want focused large-cap US stock exposure via CRSP US Large Cap Value
  • already use Vanguard and prefer staying within one fund family
Often fits investors who...
SCHV
  • want focused large-cap US stock exposure via Dow Jones US Large-Cap Value
  • already use Schwab and prefer staying within one fund family

💰 What the Fee Difference Actually Costs

Adjust the numbers for your situation. This models each fund's expense ratio compounding against your balance over time.

Assumes a constant annual return reinvested, with each fund's expense ratio deducted yearly. Illustrative only; actual returns vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

⚙️ Want the Full Interactive Comparison?

Side-by-side holdings overlap, sector breakdown, and live performance tabs, all in one place.

Run Full VTV vs SCHV Comparison → Free · No signup · Instant results
📧 Free Weekly Newsletter

Get smarter about ETFs — one concept a week, free forever

The ETF BFF newsletter breaks down one ETF concept per week — clear, jargon-free, and actually useful.

Free to learn forever · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime

✅ You're in! Check your inbox for your first issue.

❓ VTV vs SCHV — Frequently Asked Questions

VTV and SCHV are both large-cap US value ETFs with identical 0.04% expense ratios. The differences are the underlying index (VTV uses CRSP; SCHV uses Dow Jones) and fund size (VTV has ~$120B in assets vs SCHV's ~$20B). Both hold similar large-cap value stocks. Index construction differences are minor and don't produce meaningfully different performance over time.
The "value premium" — historical outperformance of cheap stocks vs expensive stocks — has been well-documented academically but has struggled in recent years as growth stocks dominated. Value severely underperformed growth from roughly 2007-2020, then had a strong recovery in 2021-2022. Whether value will outperform going forward is uncertain; most diversified investors hold some value exposure through their broad market funds automatically.
Holding VTV (value) + VUG (growth) together approximates the total S&P 500 — it's essentially deconstructing VOO into its value and growth halves. Some investors prefer this approach to tilt one direction or the other; others simply hold VOO for simplicity. If you're combining VTV + VUG at their natural weights, you'd be better served just buying VOO directly.
Top holdings in both VTV and SCHV typically include Berkshire Hathaway, JPMorgan Chase, ExxonMobil, Johnson & Johnson, Procter & Gamble, and similar large US value-oriented companies. Financial companies, healthcare, and energy tend to be overrepresented compared to the broad market. Technology names with high growth expectations are typically underweight.
IVE (iShares S&P 500 Value, 0.18%) and SPYV (SPDR S&P 500 Value, 0.10%) specifically pull value stocks from the S&P 500. VTV and SCHV use separate value indexes. All four are large-cap value ETFs with similar holdings and performance. VTV and SCHV win on cost at 0.04%. IVE and SPYV are S&P 500-branded alternatives for those who prefer that index family.

New to ETF investing? See answers to the most common ETF questions →

📄 VTV & SCHV Fact Sheets

VTV Fact Sheet SCHV Fact Sheet
ℹ️ Data shown is for educational purposes and may not reflect the most current figures. Returns are trailing price-based and exclude dividend reinvestment. Past performance does not guarantee future results. ETF BFF is not a licensed financial advisor — this is not personalized financial advice.