DFAC vs VTI: Dimensional Factor Tilt vs Total Market
VTI gives you the entire US market at near-zero cost. DFAC overweights small, cheap, profitable companies based on decades of academic factor research at 0.19%. The question is whether factor premiums are worth paying for.
VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market) holds roughly 3,700 US stocks weighted by market cap at 0.03%. DFAC (Dimensional US Core Equity 2) holds similar breadth but systematically overweights small cap and value characteristics and screens for profitability, all at 0.19%. DFAC's approach is grounded in the Fama-French three-factor model and decades of empirical research suggesting that small, cheap, profitable companies earn higher expected returns than the market-cap-weighted average. The debate is whether this premium persists going forward, especially after widespread adoption of factor strategies. Historically, DFAC-style strategies have outperformed pure cap-weighted funds over 20+ year periods. In the 2010s, growth and mega-cap tech dominated and factor tilts underperformed. VTI's 0.03% cost and total-market simplicity make it appropriate for most investors. DFAC is a serious, evidence-based alternative for investors who understand factor investing and are committed to a multi-decade holding period.
Whether the lower-cost fund suits your situation depends on your existing holdings, account type, tax situation, and how you use each fund. This is a cost comparison, not a personalized recommendation.
📋 DFAC vs VTI — Key Facts Side by Side
| Metric | DFAC | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Name | Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF | Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares |
| Issuer | Dimensional | Vanguard |
| Tracks Index | Active (factor-based) | CRSP US Total Market Index |
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.03% ✓ |
| Cost per $10K/yr | $19.00 | $3.00 |
| AUM | $47.4B | $2,202.6B |
| Holdings | 2,500 | 3,700 |
| Inception | 2022 | 2001 |
| 1-Year Return | +22.42% | +21.11% |
| 3-Year Return | +19.62% | +20.97% |
| 5-Year Return | +11.84% | +12.10% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.91% | 1.05% |
| Holdings Overlap | See holdings overlap → | |
| Avg Bid-Ask Spread | 0.03% | 0.00% |
Expense ratio, AUM, and returns updated Jul 14, 2026 from ETF BFF database. Returns are annualised. Not investment advice.
📊 DFAC vs VTI — Annualised Returns
Annualised returns (trailing, price-based). Past performance does not guarantee future results.
🎯 Which Fund Fits Which Investor?
- already use Dimensional and prefer staying within one fund family
- want the lowest fees: saves ~$16/yr per $10K vs DFAC
- want broader diversification (3,700 holdings vs 2,500)
- want the entire US stock market: large, mid, and small cap in one fund
💰 What the Fee Difference Actually Costs
Adjust the numbers for your situation. This models each fund's expense ratio compounding against your balance over time.
Assumes a constant annual return reinvested, with each fund's expense ratio deducted yearly. Illustrative only; actual returns vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
⚙️ Want the Full Interactive Comparison?
Side-by-side holdings overlap, sector breakdown, and live performance tabs, all in one place.
Run Full DFAC vs VTI Comparison → Free · No signup · Instant resultsGet smarter about ETFs — one concept a week, free forever
The ETF BFF newsletter breaks down one ETF concept per week — clear, jargon-free, and actually useful.
Free to learn forever · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime
❓ DFAC vs VTI — Frequently Asked Questions
New to ETF investing? See answers to the most common ETF questions →