MAGS vs QQQ: The Magnificent Seven, or the Whole Nasdaq-100?
MAGS holds exactly seven stocks. QQQ holds 101, including those same seven at roughly 40% combined. The question is whether you want the concentration or the breadth.
These two are closer than they look. MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven) holds just seven stocks at roughly equal weight: Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Nvidia, Meta, and Tesla, for 0.29%. QQQ (Invesco Nasdaq-100) holds 101 stocks for 0.20%, but those same seven names already make up roughly 40% of QQQ by weight, because it is market-cap weighted. So QQQ is not a different bet; it is the Magnificent Seven plus 94 other large Nasdaq companies as a cushion. MAGS simply removes that cushion and equal-weights the seven, which makes it far more concentrated and more volatile. The case for MAGS is purity: if your thesis is specifically that these seven companies keep driving the market, MAGS expresses exactly that with no dilution. The case against it is the same fact stated as a risk: seven stocks, one theme, no diversification, at a higher fee than QQQ. If any one of the seven stumbles, MAGS has nowhere to hide, while QQQ absorbs it across a hundred names. For most investors who want large-cap tech growth, QQQ (or the cheaper QQQM at 0.15%) is the more sensible vehicle, and it already gives you heavy Magnificent Seven exposure. MAGS is a high-conviction, concentrated satellite, not a core holding. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Whether the lower-cost fund suits your situation depends on your existing holdings, account type, tax situation, and how you use each fund. This is a cost comparison, not a personalized recommendation.
📋 MAGS vs QQQ — Key Facts Side by Side
| Metric | MAGS | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Name | Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | Invesco QQQ Trust |
| Issuer | Roundhill | Invesco |
| Tracks Index | Magnificent Seven (equal weight) | Nasdaq-100 |
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.20% ✓ |
| Cost per $10K/yr | $29.00 | $20.00 |
| AUM | $5B | $440.3B |
| Holdings | 7 | 101 |
| Inception | 2023 | 1999 |
| 1-Year Return | +40.00% | +41.59% |
| 3-Year Return | — | +30.10% |
| 5-Year Return | — | +17.33% |
| Dividend Yield | — | 0.42% |
| Holdings Overlap | High. All seven of MAGS' holdings are top holdings in QQQ. MAGS is essentially QQQ with everything except the Magnificent Seven removed. — see full overlap → | |
| Avg Bid-Ask Spread | 0.02% | 0.00% |
Expense ratio, AUM, and returns updated May 25, 2026 from ETF BFF database. Returns are annualised. Not investment advice.
📊 MAGS vs QQQ — Annualised Returns
Annualised returns (trailing, price-based). Past performance does not guarantee future results.
🎯 Should You Buy MAGS or QQQ?
- You want tech-heavy large-cap growth exposure via Magnificent Seven (equal weight)
- You already use Roundhill and prefer staying within their fund family
- You want the lowest fees — saves ~$9/yr per $10K vs MAGS
- You want broader diversification (101 holdings vs 7)
- You want tech-heavy large-cap growth exposure via Nasdaq-100
💰 What the Fee Difference Actually Costs
Adjust the numbers for your situation. This models each fund's expense ratio compounding against your balance over time.
Assumes a constant annual return reinvested, with each fund's expense ratio deducted yearly. Illustrative only; actual returns vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
⚙️ Want the Full Interactive Comparison?
Side-by-side holdings overlap, sector breakdown, and live performance tabs, all in one place.
Run Full MAGS vs QQQ Comparison → Free · No signup · Instant resultsGet smarter about ETFs — one concept a week, free forever
The ETF BFF newsletter breaks down one ETF concept per week — clear, jargon-free, and actually useful.
Free to learn forever · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime
❓ MAGS vs QQQ — Frequently Asked Questions
New to ETF investing? See answers to the most common ETF questions →