💰 SCHD vs VYM vs DVY · Dividend ETF Comparison

SCHD vs VYM vs DVY: Best Dividend ETF in 2026?

Three very different approaches to dividend investing. SCHD screens for quality. VYM screens for yield broadly. DVY chases the highest payers — and charges six times SCHD's fee to do it.

SCHD: 0.06% · 100 quality stocks VYM: 0.06% · 460 stocks DVY: 0.38% · highest yield focus

SCHD vs VYM vs DVY: Side-by-Side

SCHD Best for most VYM DVY
Full nameSchwab US Dividend Equity ETFVanguard High Dividend Yield ETFiShares Select Dividend ETF
IssuerSchwabVanguardiShares
Expense ratio 0.06% 0.06% 0.38%
AUM$70B$60B$18B
Holdings100 stocks460 stocks100 stocks
ScreenQuality + dividend growth (10yr history)Broad high yield (no growth screen)Highest absolute yield (dividend-weighted)
Approx. yield~3.5%~3.0%~4.5%
Inception201120062003
1-year return+16.4%+18.2%+12.8%
5-year return+12.2%+12.8%+9.4%

Yield and returns approximate. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

The BFF Take

SCHD for total return. DVY for current income — if you can stomach the fee. SCHD's methodology is the strongest of the three: it requires 10 consecutive years of dividend payments, screens for cash flow to debt, return on equity, dividend yield, and 5-year dividend growth rate. That quality screen has produced better total returns than VYM over most multi-year periods while matching VYM's fee at 0.06%. VYM holds 460+ stocks at 0.06%, which sounds like it should be more diversified — but its yield-only selection results in more utilities, telecoms, and energy names without the quality filter. VYM has had a strong recent run (the past 12 months favor its broader value tilt) but SCHD's long-term total return track record is superior. DVY's 0.38% fee is hard to justify. It targets the highest-yielding stocks by dividend-weighting, which concentrates in utilities and MLPs and occasionally traps investors in dividend-yield-trap companies. Its 5-year return trail of VYM and SCHD by roughly 3% per year confirms the fee drag matters. The only case for DVY: retirees who specifically want the highest possible quarterly income distribution and are not optimizing for total return.

Who Each Fund Is Built For

SCHD

Best for

  • Investors who want dividend growth over time
  • Quality-focused portfolios with a value tilt
  • Long-term total return optimization
  • Schwab and non-Schwab brokerage users alike
VYM

Best for

  • Vanguard account holders who want dividend income
  • Broad value exposure with dividend bias
  • Investors who prefer 460+ stock diversification
  • Complement to a growth-heavy portfolio
DVY

Best for

  • Retirees maximizing current quarterly income
  • Investors who prioritize yield over total return
  • Portfolios where cash flow matters more than growth
  • Longest track record of the three (since 2003)

Frequently Asked Questions

Is SCHD better than VYM?
Over most measurement periods since SCHD's 2011 inception, SCHD has delivered slightly better total returns than VYM at the same 0.06% expense ratio. SCHD's quality screen — requiring 10 years of consecutive dividend payments plus financial health metrics — has kept it away from dividend traps better than VYM's simpler yield-only filter. VYM holds more stocks (460 vs SCHD's 100) and has outperformed SCHD in some recent 12-month periods when broad value stocks led the market. Either is a reasonable dividend ETF; SCHD has the stronger methodology. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Why does DVY cost 0.38% when SCHD and VYM cost 0.06%?
DVY was launched in 2003 when ETF fees were significantly higher across the board. iShares has not reduced its fee to match competitors. DVY's dividend-weighted methodology (stocks weighted by dividend dollar amount rather than market cap) requires more frequent rebalancing than market-cap-weighted funds. But the primary reason the fee remains high is that DVY retains $18B in AUM despite its cost disadvantage — investors who bought it years ago hold on, and new investors sometimes confuse higher yield for better value. At 0.38%, DVY costs roughly $320/year more per $100,000 invested than SCHD or VYM.
Do dividend ETFs belong in a taxable account?
With caution. SCHD, VYM, and DVY pay qualified dividends (taxed at 0%, 15%, or 20% depending on your income) rather than ordinary income — more favorable than most bond income. But you are still paying taxes on dividends every year whether you want the income or not. Investors in high tax brackets may prefer a total-return approach with non-dividend-paying or low-dividend index funds (like VTI or VOO) in taxable accounts, which defer taxes until sale. Dividend ETFs generally belong in IRAs or tax-advantaged accounts for high-income investors. Lower-income investors who qualify for the 0% qualified dividend rate pay no tax on dividends, making taxable dividend ETFs fully efficient.
What sectors are overweight in SCHD, VYM, and DVY?
All three are underweight technology (which pays low dividends) relative to the S&P 500. SCHD is heavily weighted toward financials (~20%), industrials, healthcare, and consumer staples. VYM is broadly diversified with significant financials and energy. DVY is heavily concentrated in utilities (~25-30%) and real estate — the highest-yielding sectors by absolute dollar dividend. This sector tilt means all three tend to outperform in value/dividend-favorable markets and underperform when growth/tech leads. The 2020-2021 tech bull market was a difficult period for all three. 2022-2023 favored dividend ETFs.

Related Comparisons

SCHD vs VYM SCHD vs VOO VIG vs VYM Guide: Dividend ETFs
Past performance does not guarantee future results. Fund data is approximate. Nothing on ETF BFF is personalized financial advice.