SOXL vs SOXS: Leveraged Semiconductor ETFs Explained
SOXL and SOXS are opposite sides of the same leveraged bet on semiconductor stocks. Both reset their exposure daily. Both decay from volatility over time. Neither is designed to be held for more than a few days. This is not an investment comparison — it is an explanation of two trading instruments.
SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares) and SOXS (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares) are leveraged ETFs that provide 3x the daily return of the ICE Semiconductor Index — SOXL on the long side, SOXS on the short side. SOXL charges 0.75%; SOXS charges 1.00%, a third more, because maintaining a short position costs the fund extra. Both reset their leverage daily using derivatives, which means their performance over periods longer than one day diverges from 3x the underlying index due to compounding and volatility decay. In a choppy market where semiconductors bounce around without trending, both SOXL and SOXS can lose money simultaneously over multi-week periods. In 2022, SOXS appeared to be the winning trade — but even during Nvidia's 2023-2024 run, SOXL's daily reset meant the compounded gain was not simply 3x the index return. These products are built for active traders, not investors. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Whether the lower-cost fund suits your situation depends on your existing holdings, account type, tax situation, and how you use each fund. This is a cost comparison, not a personalized recommendation.
Both funds trade commission-free at every major brokerage. How the major brokerages compare →
📋 SOXL vs SOXS — Key Facts Side by Side
| Metric | SOXL | SOXS |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Name | Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares | Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares |
| Issuer | Direxion | Direxion |
| Tracks Index | ICE Semiconductor Index (3x Long) | ICE Semiconductor Index (3x Short) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% ✓ | 1.00% |
| Cost per $10K/yr | $75.00 | $100.00 |
| AUM | $31.6B | $1.3B |
| Holdings | 30 | 30 |
| Inception | 2010 | 2010 |
| 1-Year Return | +376.41% | -99.78% |
| 3-Year Return | +60.69% | -84.56% |
| 5-Year Return | +21.64% | -78.49% |
| Dividend Yield | — | 70.00% |
| Holdings Overlap | See holdings overlap → | |
| Avg Bid-Ask Spread | 0.03% | 0.05% |
Expense ratio, AUM, and returns updated Aug 1, 2026 from ETF BFF database. Returns are annualised. Not investment advice.
📊 SOXL vs SOXS — Annualised Returns
Annualised returns (trailing, price-based). Past performance does not guarantee future results.
🎯 Which Fund Fits Which Investor?
- want the lowest fees: saves ~$25/yr per $10K vs SOXS
- want the specific exposure defined by the ICE Semiconductor Index (3x Short)
💰 What the Fee Difference Actually Costs
Adjust the numbers for your situation. This models each fund's expense ratio compounding against your balance over time.
Assumes a constant annual return reinvested, with each fund's expense ratio deducted yearly. Illustrative only; actual returns vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
⚙️ Want the Full Interactive Comparison?
Side-by-side holdings overlap, sector breakdown, and live performance tabs, all in one place.
Run Full SOXL vs SOXS Comparison → Free · No signup · Instant resultsLeveraged ETFs: the risks most investors discover too late
Decay, rebalancing drag, and when they actually make sense — the ETF BFF newsletter gives you the full picture.
Reviewed by a CFA® charterholder · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime
❓ SOXL vs SOXS — Frequently Asked Questions
New to ETF investing? See answers to the most common ETF questions →