🔬 ETF Overlap Checker

QQQ vs QQQM Overlap: Identical Portfolios, One Costs Less

QQQ and QQQM track the same Nasdaq-100 index and hold the same 101 stocks at identical weights. QQQM saves 5 basis points per year. Buy QQQM unless you trade QQQ options.

🔁 100% identical portfolios — same 101 Nasdaq-100 stocks at the same weights
💰 QQQM charges 0.15%; QQQ charges 0.20% — $50 savings per $100,000 annually
📊 QQQ has far higher options liquidity — the only reason to prefer it

What the QQQ and QQQM Overlap Means

QQQ and QQQM are the same fund. Both are issued by Invesco. Both track the Nasdaq-100 index. Both hold exactly 101 non-financial Nasdaq-listed companies at identical weights. Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, and Meta sit at the top of both funds at the same percentages. Their overlap is 100%.

QQQM was launched in 2020 specifically to give retail investors a lower-cost version of QQQ. The 5-basis-point fee difference (QQQM at 0.15% vs QQQ at 0.20%) saves $50 per year on $100,000 invested. Over 30 years with 8% annual growth, that compounds to roughly $7,000 more in your account with QQQM.

The one exception: QQQ's options market. QQQ is the second-most actively traded ETF by options volume (after SPY). If you sell covered calls, buy protective puts, or run spreads on the Nasdaq-100, QQQ's options liquidity is significantly better than QQQM's. For that use case, QQQ's extra 5 basis points are worth paying. For everyone else, buy QQQM.

Owning both QQQ and QQQM is a common mistake — investors sometimes hold both without realizing they are identical. There is zero benefit to holding both. Consolidate into QQQM (or QQQ if you trade options) and eliminate the redundancy.

Live Holdings Comparison
VS
Fetching holdings data…
Something went wrong Check the ticker symbols and try again.
top-10 weight overlap
Positions in common
Holdings compared
Weight in same stocks
Shared Top-10 Positions
0
Top 10 Holdings Side by Side
🟡 = shared holding
BFF Recommendation

ETF BFF Newsletter

Get our weekly ETF takes.

One email per week. The ETF research, fund mechanics, and portfolio decisions that actually matter. No noise, no sales pitch.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Top-10 holdings data, updated regularly from public sources. Shared position counts reflect top-10 positions only — not full portfolio overlap. For broad market funds like VTI and VOO, true full-portfolio overlap is significantly higher than the top-10 figure. Nothing here is personalized financial advice. Full disclosures.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are QQQ and QQQM the same fund?

Yes, essentially. Both are issued by Invesco and track the Nasdaq-100 index. They hold the same 101 non-financial Nasdaq-listed companies at identical weights. The only differences are expense ratio (QQQ at 0.20% vs QQQM at 0.15%), AUM (QQQ is much larger), and options market liquidity (QQQ has far more options volume).

Should I switch from QQQ to QQQM?

If you do not trade QQQ options, yes. QQQM saves you 5 basis points per year — $50 per year on $100,000. In a taxable account, switching triggers a taxable event, so weigh the tax cost against future fee savings. In a Roth IRA or 401(k), switch with no penalty.

Why does QQQ cost more than QQQM if they hold the same stocks?

QQQ was launched in 1999 and has built up institutional inertia — options traders, arbitrageurs, and institutional investors use QQQ for its liquidity. Invesco launched QQQM in 2020 specifically to attract retail long-term investors with a lower fee. The higher QQQ fee reflects its role as a trading instrument, not a long-term hold.

Is there any reason to own both QQQ and QQQM?

No. They are identical portfolios. Owning both is redundant — you are paying two expense ratios for the same 101 stocks. Consolidate into whichever serves your purpose: QQQM for long-term holding, QQQ if you actively trade options on it.

What does the Nasdaq-100 hold?

The 101 largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange. Technology companies dominate (Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Broadcom), but the index also includes Amazon (consumer discretionary), Alphabet and Meta (communication services), Costco (consumer staples), and others. The Nasdaq-100 excludes financial sector companies entirely.