⚖️ ARKX vs XOVR Comparison · Free & No Signup

ARKX vs XOVR: The Famous Space ETF vs the One That Actually Holds SpaceX

Everyone searching for SpaceX exposure finds ARKX. It does not hold SpaceX. XOVR does, as its top position, but you pay 1.81% for it. Here is the honest comparison.

💰 ARKX is cheaper 🔬 Compare top 10 holdings → 💡 Plain-English verdict
🤝 BFF Take
Different Funds Entirely: ARKX Is a Space Theme, XOVR Is Actual SpaceX Exposure

ARKX is Cathie Wood's space and innovation ETF. It holds roughly 35 publicly traded companies across space, aerospace, 3D printing, and autonomous technology, charges 0.75%, and does not currently hold SpaceX, which is still private. XOVR is a different kind of fund: a private-public crossover ETF whose largest holding is a stake in SpaceX at about 14% of assets, bought on the secondary market. It charges 1.81%, more than double ARKX, which is the cost of an active fund that buys into private companies. So the choice is not really ARKX or XOVR on the same terms. If you specifically want SpaceX exposure today, ARKX does not give it to you and XOVR does, with the trade-offs that come with a 1.81% fee, a concentrated position, and a private valuation that is marked periodically rather than priced live. If you want a diversified, cheaper bet on the broad space and innovation theme, ARKX is the lower-cost vehicle. After the SpaceX IPO, ARK has signaled it expects to add SpaceX, and over time broad-market funds will hold it cheaply by default, which weakens the long-term case for paying 1.81% to own it early.

📋 Quick Takeaways
🚀ARKX (0.75%) is a space and innovation theme and does NOT hold SpaceX. XOVR (1.81%) holds SpaceX as its top position at about 14% of assets
💰XOVR costs more than double ARKX, the price of an active fund that buys private companies on the secondary market
🎯Want SpaceX specifically today? XOVR has it. Want a cheaper, diversified space theme? ARKX. After the IPO, broad funds will hold SpaceX cheaply anyway
📊 Data-Based Take: ARKX has the lower fee

Whether the lower-cost fund suits your situation depends on your existing holdings, account type, tax situation, and how you use each fund. This is a cost comparison, not a personalized recommendation.

Reviewed by a CFA® Charterholder · Data updated Jun 2026 · Educational only, not financial advice
ARKX
ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF
Expense Ratio
0.75% ✓
1-Year Return
+51.2%
AUM
$1.0B
Holdings
35
XOVR
ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF
Expense Ratio
1.81%
1-Year Return
+9.4%
AUM
$2.2B
Holdings
33

📋 ARKX vs XOVR — Key Facts Side by Side

Metric ARKX XOVR
Fund Name ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF
Issuer ARK Invest ERShares
Tracks Index Active (space & innovation) Active (private + public crossover)
Expense Ratio 0.75% ✓ 1.81%
Cost per $10K/yr $75.00 $181.00
AUM $1.0B $2.2B
Holdings 35 33
Inception 2021 2017
1-Year Return +51.20% +9.40%
3-Year Return
5-Year Return
Avg Bid-Ask Spread 0.04% 0.09%

Data from ETF BFF database. Returns are annualised. Not investment advice.

📊 ARKX vs XOVR — Annualised Returns

Annualised returns (trailing, price-based). Past performance does not guarantee future results.

🎯 Should You Buy ARKX or XOVR?

Choose if...
ARKX
  • You want the lowest fees — saves ~$106/yr per $10K vs XOVR
  • You already use ARK Invest and prefer staying within their fund family
Choose if...
XOVR
  • You already use ERShares and prefer staying within their fund family

⚙️ Want the Full Interactive Comparison?

Top holdings comparison, sector breakdown, 30-year cost impact calculator, and more — all in one place.

Run Full ARKX vs XOVR Comparison → Free · No signup · Instant results
📧 Free Weekly Newsletter

Get smarter about ETFs — one concept a week, free forever

The ETF BFF newsletter breaks down one ETF concept per week — clear, jargon-free, and actually useful.

Free to learn forever · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime

✅ You're in! Check your inbox for your first issue.

❓ ARKX vs XOVR — Frequently Asked Questions

No. As of mid-2026, ARKX does not hold SpaceX directly, because SpaceX is still private. ARKX holds publicly traded space, aerospace, and innovation companies. ARK Invest has held SpaceX in some of its private vehicles and has signaled it expects to add SpaceX to ARKX after the company goes public. So ARKX is a space theme today, not a SpaceX position.
Yes. XOVR (ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF) holds a stake in SpaceX as its largest position, around 14% of assets, bought on the private secondary market. That makes XOVR one of the few broadly available ETFs with real, current SpaceX exposure. It charges 1.81% a year for that access.
XOVR charges 1.81% versus ARKX at 0.75%. The gap reflects what XOVR does: it actively buys positions in private companies like SpaceX, which is operationally expensive and not something a standard index fund can do. You are paying for access to private holdings, not just active management.
If you want SpaceX exposure before or around the IPO, XOVR is the one that actually holds it today. ARKX does not, though it may add SpaceX after the listing. The longer-term wrinkle: once SpaceX is public, broad-market and total-market funds will hold it automatically at a small weight and near-zero cost, which weakens the case for paying 1.81% to own it early. This is general information, not a recommendation to buy either fund.
No. SpaceX is private, so its value inside XOVR is a private valuation that is marked periodically, not a live market price. That means the exposure is less precise than owning a public stock, and the fund carries concentration risk from having so much in a single private position. Both are real risks to understand before buying.

New to ETF investing? See answers to the most common ETF questions →

📄 ARKX & XOVR Fact Sheets

ARKX Fact Sheet XOVR Fact Sheet
ℹ️ Data shown is for educational purposes and may not reflect the most current figures. Returns are trailing price-based and exclude dividend reinvestment. Past performance does not guarantee future results. ETF BFF is not a licensed financial advisor — this is not personalized financial advice.