⚖️ IBIT vs ARKB Comparison · Free & No Signup

IBIT vs ARKB: Same Bitcoin, Different Fee Schedule

Both funds hold spot bitcoin with a qualified custodian. The exposure is identical. What separates them is a four basis point listed fee gap, a temporary waiver that expires in October 2026, and a very large difference in size.

💰 ARKB is cheaper 🔬 Compare top 10 holdings → 💡 Plain-English verdict
🤝 BFF Take
IBIT Wins on Liquidity; ARKB Is Cheaper, With a Deadline Attached

IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust) holds roughly $45B and charges 0.25%. ARKB (ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF) holds about $2.1B and lists 0.21%. On paper ARKB is cheaper by four basis points, which is $4 a year per $10,000. The wrinkle is that 21Shares waived ARKB's entire management fee through October 8, 2026, so the effective cost today is zero and reverts to 0.21% after that date. Any fee comparison you read is therefore only valid with a date attached. Structurally the funds are near-identical: both hold spot bitcoin rather than futures, both use a qualified custodian, and both are grantor trusts taxed as bitcoin rather than as fund shares. IBIT is roughly 20 times larger, which shows up as tighter bid-ask spreads and a far deeper options market. For a small buy-and-hold position the fee gap is trivial either way; for size or options, liquidity is the differentiator.

📋 Quick Takeaways
ARKB's management fee is fully waived through October 8, 2026, then reverts to the listed 0.21%
💧IBIT holds roughly $45B against ARKB's $2.1B, so spreads and options depth strongly favor IBIT
🔗Identical exposure: both hold spot bitcoin with a qualified custodian, not futures contracts
📊 Data-Based Take: IBIT has the lower fee

Whether the lower-cost fund suits your situation depends on your existing holdings, account type, tax situation, and how you use each fund. This is a cost comparison, not a personalized recommendation.

Both funds trade commission-free at every major brokerage. How the major brokerages compare →

Reviewed by a CFA® Charterholder · Data as of Aug 1, 2026 · Educational only, not financial advice
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
Expense Ratio
0.25%
1-Year Return
-42.9%
AUM
$43.2B
Holdings
1
ARKB
ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
Expense Ratio
0.21% ✓
1-Year Return
AUM
$2.1B
Holdings
1

📋 IBIT vs ARKB — Key Facts Side by Side

Metric IBIT ARKB
Fund Name iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
Issuer BlackRock ARK 21Shares
Tracks Index Spot bitcoin Spot bitcoin
Expense Ratio 0.25% 0.21% ✓
Cost per $10K/yr $25.00 $21.00
AUM $43.2B $2.1B
Holdings 1 1
Inception 2024 2024
1-Year Return -42.85%
3-Year Return
5-Year Return
Holdings Overlap See holdings overlap →
Avg Bid-Ask Spread 0.01% 0.04%

Expense ratio, AUM, and returns updated Aug 1, 2026 from ETF BFF database. Returns are annualised. Not investment advice.

📊 IBIT vs ARKB — Annualised Returns

Annualised returns (trailing, price-based). Past performance does not guarantee future results.

🎯 Which Fund Fits Which Investor?

Often fits investors who...
IBIT
  • already use BlackRock and prefer staying within one fund family
Often fits investors who...
ARKB
  • want the lowest fees: saves ~$4/yr per $10K vs IBIT
  • already use ARK 21Shares and prefer staying within one fund family

💰 What the Fee Difference Actually Costs

Adjust the numbers for your situation. This models each fund's expense ratio compounding against your balance over time.

Assumes a constant annual return reinvested, with each fund's expense ratio deducted yearly. Illustrative only; actual returns vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

⚙️ Want the Full Interactive Comparison?

Side-by-side holdings overlap, sector breakdown, and live performance tabs, all in one place.

Run Full IBIT vs ARKB Comparison → Free · No signup · Instant results
📧 Free Weekly Newsletter

Get smarter about ETFs — one concept a week, free forever

The ETF BFF newsletter breaks down one ETF concept per week — clear, jargon-free, and actually useful.

Reviewed by a CFA® charterholder · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime

✅ You're in! Check your inbox for your first issue.

❓ IBIT vs ARKB — Frequently Asked Questions

On the listed fee, yes: 0.21% against IBIT's 0.25%, a difference of $4 a year per $10,000. Right now the gap is larger, because 21Shares waived ARKB's entire management fee through October 8, 2026, making the effective cost zero until that date. After the waiver expires the difference returns to four basis points. Confirm the current schedule with the issuer, since waiver end dates are the one number in this comparison that changes on a fixed calendar.
Very little in what you own. Both are spot bitcoin ETFs holding real bitcoin with a qualified custodian, both are structured as grantor trusts, and both track bitcoin's price directly rather than through futures. The differences are commercial: fee schedule, issuer, and size. IBIT holds roughly $45B against ARKB's $2.1B, which is the practical difference for anyone trading size or using options.
It matters for trading costs rather than for safety. A larger fund generally has tighter bid-ask spreads, so you lose less to the spread each time you buy or sell, and it supports a deeper options market. IBIT's size advantage over ARKB is substantial. For a buy-and-hold position bought once and held for years, the effect is small; for frequent trading or options strategies, it is the main consideration.
Yes. Both are grantor trusts, so holders are treated as owning bitcoin directly rather than shares in a fund. Gains are ordinary capital gains at standard short-term and long-term rates, not the 28% collectibles rate that applies to physically backed metals funds. Both also generate small taxable dispositions when the trust sells bitcoin to pay expenses. This is general information, not tax advice.
Among the large funds, BITB at 0.20% has the lowest standing fee, with ARKB at 0.21%, then IBIT and FBTC at 0.25%. Temporary waivers regularly reorder this list, which is why the answer depends on the date you ask. GBTC at 1.50% sits far above all of them. Fee differences at this level are measured in single dollars per $10,000 per year, so liquidity and issuer preference often matter more than the ranking.

New to ETF investing? See answers to the most common ETF questions →

📄 IBIT & ARKB Fact Sheets

IBIT Fact Sheet ARKB Fact Sheet
ℹ️ Data shown is for educational purposes and may not reflect the most current figures. Returns are trailing price-based and exclude dividend reinvestment. Past performance does not guarantee future results. ETF BFF is not a licensed financial advisor — this is not personalized financial advice.