⚖️ QQQM vs VGT Comparison · Free & No Signup

QQQM vs VGT: Growth Index vs the Whole Tech Sector

They look similar at the top because the same mega-caps dominate both. Underneath, QQQM is a multi-sector Nasdaq-100 fund and VGT is the entire US technology sector.

💰 VGT is cheaper 🔬 Compare top 10 holdings → 💡 Plain-English verdict
🤝 BFF Take
One Is a Growth Index, the Other Is a Sector

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100: 101 of the largest non-financial Nasdaq companies, which is tech-heavy but also holds consumer, communication, and healthcare names like Costco, PepsiCo, and Amgen. VGT tracks the US information-technology sector and holds roughly 315 companies, reaching well into mid-cap tech, and it classifies Visa and Mastercard as technology, which QQQM does not hold as tech. So VGT is the broader, purer technology fund by count, while QQQM is a narrower list that spreads across more sectors. On cost, VGT is cheaper at 0.10% versus QQQM at 0.15%. Choose VGT if you want full US technology exposure including mid-caps. Choose QQQM if you want the Nasdaq-100 growth basket rather than a pure sector bet. The deeper question with either is how much single-sector concentration your portfolio can absorb, because both lean heavily on the same handful of mega-cap names.

📋 Quick Takeaways
🧩Different jobs: QQQM is the Nasdaq-100 (multi-sector growth); VGT is the entire US technology sector.
🔢VGT holds ~315 stocks including mid-cap tech and payment names like Visa; QQQM holds 101 across several sectors.
💰VGT is cheaper at 0.10% vs QQQM at 0.15%. On $10,000 that is $10/yr vs $15/yr.
Reviewed by a CFA® Charterholder · Data updated Jun 2026 · Educational only, not financial advice
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Expense Ratio
0.15%
1-Year Return
+41.7%
AUM
$82.9B
Holdings
101
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
Expense Ratio
0.10% ✓
1-Year Return
+56.3%
AUM
$146.5B
Holdings
315

📋 QQQM vs VGT — Key Facts Side by Side

Metric QQQM VGT
Fund Name Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares
Issuer Invesco Vanguard
Tracks Index Nasdaq-100 MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50
Expense Ratio 0.15% 0.10% ✓
Cost per $10K/yr $15.00 $10.00
AUM $82.9B $146.5B
Holdings 101 315
Inception 2020 2004
1-Year Return +41.67% +56.27%
3-Year Return +30.19% +33.76%
5-Year Return +17.42% +20.81%
Dividend Yield 0.46% 0.37%
Holdings Overlap See holdings overlap →
Avg Bid-Ask Spread 1.00% 1.00%

Expense ratio, AUM, and returns updated May 25, 2026 from ETF BFF database. Returns are annualised. Not investment advice.

📊 QQQM vs VGT — Annualised Returns

Annualised returns (trailing, price-based). Past performance does not guarantee future results.

🎯 Should You Buy QQQM or VGT?

Choose if...
QQQM
  • You want tech-heavy large-cap growth exposure via Nasdaq-100
  • You already use Invesco and prefer staying within their fund family
Choose if...
VGT
  • You want the lowest fees — saves ~$5/yr per $10K vs QQQM
  • You want broader diversification (315 holdings vs 101)

💰 What the Fee Difference Actually Costs

Adjust the numbers for your situation. This models each fund's expense ratio compounding against your balance over time.

Assumes a constant annual return reinvested, with each fund's expense ratio deducted yearly. Illustrative only; actual returns vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

⚙️ Want the Full Interactive Comparison?

Side-by-side holdings overlap, sector breakdown, and live performance tabs, all in one place.

Run Full QQQM vs VGT Comparison → Free · No signup · Instant results
📧 Free Weekly Newsletter

Get smarter about ETFs — one concept a week, free forever

The ETF BFF newsletter breaks down one ETF concept per week — clear, jargon-free, and actually useful.

Free to learn forever · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime

✅ You're in! Check your inbox for your first issue.

❓ QQQM vs VGT — Frequently Asked Questions

No. QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100, holding 101 of the largest non-financial Nasdaq companies across technology, consumer, communication, and healthcare. VGT tracks the US information-technology sector and holds roughly 315 stocks that are all technology companies. They overlap heavily at the top because the same mega-caps dominate both, but QQQM is a broad growth fund and VGT is a pure technology-sector fund.
VGT holds far more, roughly 315 companies versus 101 for QQQM. VGT reaches into mid-cap technology and includes payment-processing names such as Visa and Mastercard, which are classified as technology. QQQM is capped at the 101 largest Nasdaq-listed non-financial companies, so it is the more concentrated list by count even though it spans more sectors.
Yes. QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100, so it holds large non-technology companies like Costco, PepsiCo, and Amgen across consumer staples, consumer discretionary, communication services, and healthcare. VGT is technology only. If you want exposure to the non-tech parts of the Nasdaq-100, VGT will not give it to you.
Both are reasonable long-term holdings, and the choice depends on what you want. VGT gives you the complete US technology sector at a slightly lower 0.10% fee, with deeper mid-cap exposure. QQQM gives you the Nasdaq-100 growth basket at 0.15%, which is less of a pure sector bet. Either way, both are heavily concentrated in a few mega-cap names, so size the position to how much single-sector risk your overall portfolio can carry.

New to ETF investing? See answers to the most common ETF questions →

📄 QQQM & VGT Fact Sheets

QQQM Fact Sheet VGT Fact Sheet
ℹ️ Data shown is for educational purposes and may not reflect the most current figures. Returns are trailing price-based and exclude dividend reinvestment. Past performance does not guarantee future results. ETF BFF is not a licensed financial advisor — this is not personalized financial advice.