⚖️ QQQM vs XLK Comparison · Free & No Signup

QQQM vs XLK: Not the Same Fund, Despite the Overlap

People assume these are interchangeable tech funds. They are not. QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100 across several sectors. XLK holds only the technology stocks in the S&P 500.

💰 XLK is cheaper 🔬 Compare top 10 holdings → 💡 Plain-English verdict
🤝 BFF Take
Different Indexes, Different Bets

QQQM and XLK get confused constantly, but they track different things. QQQM follows the Nasdaq-100: the 101 largest non-financial companies on the Nasdaq, which is tech-heavy but also includes names like Costco, PepsiCo, and Netflix across consumer, communication, and healthcare. XLK is narrower. It holds only the information-technology stocks inside the S&P 500, roughly 65 companies, and Apple plus Microsoft alone are close to 40% of the fund. So XLK is the more concentrated, purer technology bet, while QQQM is broad large-cap growth that happens to lean tech. On cost, XLK is cheaper at 0.09% versus QQQM at 0.15%. Choose XLK if you specifically want a concentrated US technology position. Choose QQQM if you want the broader Nasdaq-100 growth basket, not just the tech slice.

📋 Quick Takeaways
🧩Different indexes: QQQM is the Nasdaq-100 (multi-sector growth); XLK is S&P 500 technology only.
🎯XLK is far more concentrated. Apple and Microsoft are roughly 40% of XLK; QQQM spreads across more names and sectors.
💰XLK is cheaper at 0.09% vs QQQM at 0.15%. On $10,000 that is $9/yr vs $15/yr.
Reviewed by a CFA® Charterholder · Data updated Jun 2026 · Educational only, not financial advice
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Expense Ratio
0.15%
1-Year Return
+41.7%
AUM
$82.9B
Holdings
101
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
Expense Ratio
0.09% ✓
1-Year Return
+60.0%
AUM
$103.3B
Holdings
65

📋 QQQM vs XLK — Key Facts Side by Side

Metric QQQM XLK
Fund Name Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
Issuer Invesco State Street
Tracks Index Nasdaq-100 S&P Technology Select Sector
Expense Ratio 0.15% 0.09% ✓
Cost per $10K/yr $15.00 $9.00
AUM $82.9B $103.3B
Holdings 101 65
Inception 2020 1998
1-Year Return +41.67% +59.98%
3-Year Return +30.19% +33.64%
5-Year Return +17.42% +22.01%
Dividend Yield 0.46% 0.48%
Holdings Overlap See holdings overlap →
Avg Bid-Ask Spread 1.00% 1.00%

Expense ratio, AUM, and returns updated May 25, 2026 from ETF BFF database. Returns are annualised. Not investment advice.

📊 QQQM vs XLK — Annualised Returns

Annualised returns (trailing, price-based). Past performance does not guarantee future results.

🎯 Should You Buy QQQM or XLK?

Choose if...
QQQM
  • You want broader diversification (101 holdings vs 65)
  • You want tech-heavy large-cap growth exposure via Nasdaq-100
Choose if...
XLK
  • You want the lowest fees — saves ~$6/yr per $10K vs QQQM
  • You already use State Street and prefer staying within their fund family

💰 What the Fee Difference Actually Costs

Adjust the numbers for your situation. This models each fund's expense ratio compounding against your balance over time.

Assumes a constant annual return reinvested, with each fund's expense ratio deducted yearly. Illustrative only; actual returns vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

⚙️ Want the Full Interactive Comparison?

Side-by-side holdings overlap, sector breakdown, and live performance tabs, all in one place.

Run Full QQQM vs XLK Comparison → Free · No signup · Instant results
📧 Free Weekly Newsletter

Get smarter about ETFs — one concept a week, free forever

The ETF BFF newsletter breaks down one ETF concept per week — clear, jargon-free, and actually useful.

Free to learn forever · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime

✅ You're in! Check your inbox for your first issue.

❓ QQQM vs XLK — Frequently Asked Questions

No. QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100, which holds 101 of the largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq across technology, consumer, communication, and healthcare. XLK tracks only the information-technology stocks within the S&P 500, roughly 65 companies. They share many of the same mega-cap tech names at the top, but QQQM is a broad growth fund while XLK is a pure technology-sector fund.
XLK is more concentrated. Apple and Microsoft together make up close to 40% of XLK, and its roughly 65 holdings are all technology companies. QQQM holds 101 stocks spread across several sectors, so no two names dominate it the way they dominate XLK. If single-stock concentration is a concern, QQQM is the more diversified of the two.
Yes. Because QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100 rather than a technology index, it includes large non-technology names such as Costco, PepsiCo, and Amgen. Technology is the largest sector, but communication services, consumer discretionary, consumer staples, and healthcare are all represented. XLK, by contrast, is technology only.
XLK is cheaper, charging 0.09% versus QQQM at 0.15%. On a $10,000 investment that is about $9 per year for XLK versus $15 for QQQM. The difference is small in dollar terms, so the more important decision is whether you want a broad Nasdaq-100 growth fund (QQQM) or a concentrated technology-sector fund (XLK).

New to ETF investing? See answers to the most common ETF questions →

📄 QQQM & XLK Fact Sheets

QQQM Fact Sheet XLK Fact Sheet
ℹ️ Data shown is for educational purposes and may not reflect the most current figures. Returns are trailing price-based and exclude dividend reinvestment. Past performance does not guarantee future results. ETF BFF is not a licensed financial advisor — this is not personalized financial advice.