SCHA vs AVUV: Total Small-Cap Market vs Factor-Tilted Small-Cap
SCHA owns the entire U.S. small-cap market at near-zero cost. AVUV deliberately concentrates in small-cap stocks that score highest on value and profitability. These serve different investment philosophies, not the same one at different price points.
SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) and AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) both hold U.S. small-cap stocks, but they are fundamentally different products. SCHA tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index — over 1,700 stocks, market-cap weighted, no quality or value screen. You own the full small-cap market, including unprofitable growth companies. AVUV is an actively managed fund using Fama-French factor research to concentrate in small-cap stocks that are simultaneously cheap (value) and highly profitable. It holds around 730 stocks and charges 0.25% versus SCHA's 0.04%. The 21 basis point gap matters over time, but the question is whether AVUV's factor premium compensates. Since AVUV launched in 2019, it has outperformed SCHA meaningfully — but the difference may reflect the specific market environment rather than a guaranteed premium. SCHA Schwab investors who want low-cost broad small-cap exposure: stick with SCHA. Investors who specifically want to tilt toward value and profitability factors: AVUV is built for that purpose.
Whether the lower-cost fund suits your situation depends on your existing holdings, account type, tax situation, and how you use each fund. This is a cost comparison, not a personalized recommendation.
Both funds trade commission-free at every major brokerage. Where to buy them →
📋 SCHA vs AVUV: Key Facts Side by Side
| Metric | SCHA | AVUV |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Name | Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF |
| Issuer | Schwab | Avantis |
| Tracks Index | Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market | Active (Factor-Based) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.04% ✓ | 0.25% |
| Cost per $10K/yr | $4.00 | $25.00 |
| AUM | $22.6B | $31.2B |
| Holdings | 1,750 | 730 |
| Inception | 2009 | 2019 |
| 1-Year Return | +18.62% | +20.80% |
| 3-Year Return | +17.73% | +17.64% |
| 5-Year Return | +7.08% | +12.39% |
| Dividend Yield | 1.05% | 1.25% |
| Holdings Overlap | See holdings overlap → | |
| Avg Bid-Ask Spread | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Expense ratio, AUM, and returns updated Sep 22, 2026 from ETF BFF database. Returns are annualised. Not investment advice.
You just compared two funds. Get the next one figured out for you.
One clear ETF breakdown in your inbox every week: fees, holdings, and the honest verdict. Free.
One email a week · No spam, unsubscribe anytime
📊 SCHA vs AVUV: Annualised Returns
Annualised returns (trailing, price-based). Past performance does not guarantee future results.
🎯 Which Fund Fits Which Investor?
- want the lowest fees: saves ~$21/yr per $10K vs AVUV
- want broader diversification (1,750 holdings vs 730)
- already use Avantis and prefer staying within one fund family
💰 What the Fee Difference Actually Costs
Adjust the numbers for your situation. This models each fund's expense ratio compounding against your balance over time.
Assumes a constant annual return reinvested, with each fund's expense ratio deducted yearly. Illustrative only; actual returns vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
⚙️ Want the Full Interactive Comparison?
Side-by-side holdings overlap, sector breakdown, and live performance tabs, all in one place.
Run Full SCHA vs AVUV Comparison → Free · No signup · Instant results❓ SCHA vs AVUV: Frequently Asked Questions
New to ETF investing? See answers to the most common ETF questions →