⚖️ SPMO vs MTUM Comparison · Free & No Signup

SPMO vs MTUM: The Two Momentum ETFs, Compared

Both buy what has been going up. SPMO draws from the S&P 500; MTUM draws from a broader US universe and smooths for volatility. The methods differ more than the names suggest.

💰 SPMO is cheaper 🔬 Compare top 10 holdings → 💡 Plain-English verdict
🤝 BFF Take
Same Factor, Different Engines: SPMO Is More Concentrated and Faster, MTUM Is Broader and Smoother

SPMO and MTUM are both momentum funds, which means they hold the stocks with the strongest recent price trend and rotate as that trend shifts. The differences are in the engine. SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum) selects the roughly 100 highest-momentum stocks from within the S&P 500 only, weights them by a combination of momentum score and market cap, and rebalances twice a year, at 0.13%. MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum) draws from a broader MSCI USA universe that includes mid-caps, and it adjusts its momentum signal for volatility, which makes it a bit slower and smoother, at 0.15%. In practice, SPMO has been the more concentrated and faster-reacting of the two, and it has outperformed MTUM through the recent megacap-momentum run because it leaned harder into the leaders. That edge is real but it cuts both ways: momentum strategies are designed to ride trends and they whipsaw at sharp market turns, selling after declines and buying after run-ups. SPMO's greater concentration means a larger swing when momentum reverses; MTUM's volatility adjustment is meant to soften exactly that, at the cost of lagging in a strong trend. Momentum is one of the most academically documented factors, but it is a tilt for a satellite slice of a portfolio, not a core holding, and neither fund changes that. If you want the more aggressive, recently better-performing version, SPMO; if you want the broader, slightly steadier construction, MTUM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

📋 Quick Takeaways
🏎️SPMO is S&P 500-only, more concentrated, and faster-reacting. It has outperformed MTUM through the recent megacap-momentum run.
🛞MTUM draws from a broader universe (includes mid-caps) and smooths its signal for volatility, making it steadier but slower to react.
🌀Both are momentum tilts for a satellite slice, not a core. Momentum rides trends but whipsaws at sharp market turns.
📊 Data-Based Take: SPMO has the lower fee

Whether the lower-cost fund suits your situation depends on your existing holdings, account type, tax situation, and how you use each fund. This is a cost comparison, not a personalized recommendation.

Reviewed by a CFA® Charterholder · Data updated Jun 2026 · Educational only, not financial advice
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
Expense Ratio
0.13% ✓
1-Year Return
+33.0%
AUM
$20B
Holdings
100
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
Expense Ratio
0.15%
1-Year Return
+35.6%
AUM
$24.2B
Holdings
125

📋 SPMO vs MTUM — Key Facts Side by Side

Metric SPMO MTUM
Fund Name Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
Issuer Invesco iShares
Tracks Index S&P 500 Momentum MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant
Expense Ratio 0.13% ✓ 0.15%
Cost per $10K/yr $13.00 $15.00
AUM $20B $24.2B
Holdings 100 125
Inception 2015 2013
1-Year Return +33.00% +35.58%
3-Year Return +19.00% +31.16%
5-Year Return +17.00% +13.85%
Dividend Yield 0.69%
Holdings Overlap Moderate. Both chase price momentum and currently lean toward the same megacap winners, but they draw from different universes, so the exact holdings differ. — see full overlap →
Avg Bid-Ask Spread 0.01% 0.01%

Expense ratio, AUM, and returns updated May 25, 2026 from ETF BFF database. Returns are annualised. Not investment advice.

📊 SPMO vs MTUM — Annualised Returns

Annualised returns (trailing, price-based). Past performance does not guarantee future results.

🎯 Should You Buy SPMO or MTUM?

Choose if...
SPMO
  • You want the lowest fees — saves ~$2/yr per $10K vs MTUM
  • You already use Invesco and prefer staying within their fund family
Choose if...
MTUM
  • You already use iShares and prefer staying within their fund family

💰 What the Fee Difference Actually Costs

Adjust the numbers for your situation. This models each fund's expense ratio compounding against your balance over time.

Assumes a constant annual return reinvested, with each fund's expense ratio deducted yearly. Illustrative only; actual returns vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

⚙️ Want the Full Interactive Comparison?

Side-by-side holdings overlap, sector breakdown, and live performance tabs, all in one place.

Run Full SPMO vs MTUM Comparison → Free · No signup · Instant results
📧 Free Weekly Newsletter

Get smarter about ETFs — one concept a week, free forever

The ETF BFF newsletter breaks down one ETF concept per week — clear, jargon-free, and actually useful.

Free to learn forever · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime

✅ You're in! Check your inbox for your first issue.

❓ SPMO vs MTUM — Frequently Asked Questions

Both are momentum ETFs that hold the stocks with the strongest recent price trend, but they are built differently. SPMO selects the highest-momentum stocks from within the S&P 500 only and rebalances twice a year, at 0.13%. MTUM draws from a broader MSCI USA universe that includes mid-caps and adjusts its momentum signal for volatility, at 0.15%. SPMO is more concentrated and faster-reacting; MTUM is broader and a bit smoother. They currently overlap in many megacap names but their construction differs.
Yes, over recent years SPMO has outperformed MTUM, returning more on a one-, three-, and five-year basis. The main reason is that SPMO is more concentrated and reacted faster to the megacap-technology momentum run, while MTUM's volatility adjustment and broader universe made it slower to lean into the leaders. That outperformance reflects a specific trend environment and is not guaranteed to persist, since momentum strategies can reverse sharply. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Momentum is one of the most academically documented factors, with decades of research showing that recent winners tend to keep winning over intermediate horizons. The risk is the turn: because momentum funds buy what has gone up and sell what has gone down, they can get caught selling near bottoms and buying near tops when the market reverses sharply, producing painful drawdowns. That is why momentum is best used as a tilt for a satellite portion of a portfolio rather than as a core holding.
Usually not. They are two versions of the same factor, so holding both gives you a heavier momentum tilt rather than diversification, and their holdings overlap substantially when the same names dominate the trend. If you want momentum exposure, pick the construction you prefer: SPMO for the more concentrated, S&P 500-based, recently stronger version, or MTUM for the broader, volatility-adjusted approach. Owning one is enough for a satellite tilt.

New to ETF investing? See answers to the most common ETF questions →

📄 SPMO & MTUM Fact Sheets

SPMO Fact Sheet MTUM Fact Sheet
ℹ️ Data shown is for educational purposes and may not reflect the most current figures. Returns are trailing price-based and exclude dividend reinvestment. Past performance does not guarantee future results. ETF BFF is not a licensed financial advisor — this is not personalized financial advice.