TLT vs SGOV: Long Bonds vs Cash, and the Risk Between Them
Both hold US Treasuries, but at opposite ends of the maturity ladder. TLT is a bet on interest rates with equity-like swings. SGOV is a place to park cash. They do completely different jobs.
TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) and SGOV (iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF) both hold US government debt, but that is where the similarity ends. TLT owns Treasuries that mature in 20 years or more, so its price swings sharply whenever long-term interest rates move. When rates rose over the past few years, TLT fell hard, posting losses that look more like a stock than a bond fund. SGOV owns Treasury bills that mature in weeks, so its price barely moves and almost all of its return is the yield it pays, currently around 4%. That makes this a risk comparison, not a yield one. The two pay a broadly similar yield, but TLT carries enormous price risk to earn it and SGOV carries almost none. Hold TLT if you specifically want duration: a position that rises when long-term rates fall, useful as a rate bet or a hedge against a recession, and you can stomach double-digit swings. Hold SGOV if you want your money stable and liquid while it earns the short-term risk-free rate. Both are exempt from state income tax because Treasury interest is. The common mistake is buying TLT "for income" when its yield is similar to SGOV's but comes with vastly more risk. If you want safe yield, that is SGOV's job, not TLT's.
Both funds trade commission-free at every major brokerage. Where to buy them →
📋 TLT vs SGOV: Key Facts Side by Side
| Metric | TLT | SGOV |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Name | iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| Tracks Index | ICE US Treasury 20+ Year | ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury |
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.09% ✓ |
| Cost per $10K/yr | $15.00 | $9.00 |
| AUM | $46.2B | $112.3B |
| Holdings | 45 | 15 |
| Inception | 2002 | 2020 |
| 1-Year Return | -13.34% | +0.00% |
| 3-Year Return | +0.69% | +4.52% |
| 5-Year Return | -8.47% | +3.79% |
| Dividend Yield | 5.00% | 3.69% |
| Holdings Overlap | See holdings overlap → | |
| Avg Bid-Ask Spread | 0.01% | 0.01% |
AUM and returns updated Oct 7, 2026 from ETF BFF database; expense ratios verified against issuer filings. Returns are annualised. Not investment advice.
Bond ETFs without the fixed-income jargon
Duration, yield curves, credit risk: explained in plain English, free forever.
One email a week · No spam, unsubscribe anytime
📊 TLT vs SGOV: Annualised Returns
Annualised returns (trailing, price-based). Past performance does not guarantee future results.
🎯 Which Fund Fits Which Investor?
- want broader diversification (45 holdings vs 15)
- want income and stability with lower portfolio volatility
- want the lowest fees: saves ~$6/yr per $10K vs TLT
💰 What the Fee Difference Actually Costs
Adjust the numbers for your situation. This models each fund's expense ratio compounding against your balance over time.
Assumes a constant annual return reinvested, with each fund's expense ratio deducted yearly. Illustrative only; actual returns vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
⚙️ Want the Full Interactive Comparison?
Side-by-side holdings overlap, sector breakdown, and live performance tabs, all in one place.
Run Full TLT vs SGOV Comparison → Free · No signup · Instant results❓ TLT vs SGOV: Frequently Asked Questions
New to ETF investing? See answers to the most common ETF questions →