🔬 Free Tool — No Signup Required

ETF Top Holdings Comparison

See which stocks two ETFs share in their top 10 positions, and how much weight each fund puts behind them. Instant, honest, no account needed.

VS
Try:
Fetching holdings data…
Something went wrong Check the ticker symbols and try again.
top-10 weight overlap
Positions in common
Holdings compared
Weight in same stocks
Shared Top-10 Positions
0
Top 10 Holdings Side by Side
🟡 = shared holding
BFF Recommendation

ETF BFF Newsletter

Get our weekly ETF takes.

One email per week. The ETF research, fund mechanics, and portfolio decisions that actually matter. No noise, no sales pitch.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Top-10 holdings data, updated regularly from public sources. Shared position counts and weight percentages reflect top-10 positions only — not full portfolio overlap. For broad market funds (VTI, VOO, SPY), true overlap is significantly higher than what top-10 data shows. Nothing here is personalized financial advice. Full disclosures.

Popular Comparisons

What this tool shows — and what it doesn't

This tool compares the top 10 holdings of two ETFs by weight. For each company that appears in both funds, it shows the weight each fund assigns to it. The top-10 weight overlap percentage is the sum of the minimum weight for each shared position — a measure of how much top-position capital lands in the same stock through both funds.

This is not a full portfolio overlap tool. VTI owns 3,700 stocks; its top 10 represent about 34% of its weight. The true overlap between VTI and VOO is approximately 82% across all holdings — this tool will show a lower figure because it only sees the top 10 positions. For complete portfolio overlap, ETF.com uses Morningstar full holdings data and is the right resource for broad index fund comparisons.

Where this tool is reliable: concentrated funds. For sector ETFs, dividend ETFs, and factor ETFs — where the top 10 positions represent 40-50% of fund weight — the shared holdings comparison gives a meaningful read on whether two funds are betting on the same companies. It also shows exactly which companies those are and how heavily each fund weights them.

Full Pair Analyses

These pages go deeper than the tool: written analysis, common questions answered, and context on whether owning both funds is redundant or complementary.

VTI vs VOO
VOO is 83% of VTI. Redundant to own both.
VOO vs QQQ
QQQ doubles your tech concentration. Not diversification.
SPY vs VOO
Identical index. SPY costs 0.065% more. Only reason to choose SPY: options.
QQQ vs QQQM
100% identical. QQQM saves 5 bps. Buy QQQM unless you trade options.
VTI vs QQQ
QQQ's 101 stocks sit in VTI at 5-7x lower weight. Active Nasdaq bet.
QQQ vs VGT
Amazon/Alphabet in QQQ, not VGT. Visa/Mastercard in VGT, not QQQ.
SCHD vs VYM
SCHD quality screen (~100 stocks) vs VYM yield breadth (~450 stocks).
VTI vs VGT
VTI is already 30%+ IT sector. Adding VGT is an active tech bet.
SCHD vs VOO
VOO for growth, SCHD for income. Genuinely good combination.
VIG vs SCHD
VIG requires 10+ yr growth (includes AAPL/MSFT). SCHD needs yield + quality.
JEPI vs JEPQ
Same ELN options strategy. JEPI = S&P 500 core. JEPQ = Nasdaq-100 core.
VTI vs VXUS
Zero overlap. Different markets entirely. Together they build the global portfolio.

The ETF Overlap Problem — why top holdings matter →    Analyze your full portfolio →